2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cathode flow fields on direct methanol fuel cell-simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methanol crossover causes mixed potential resulting in lowering of cell voltage, lowering of fuel and system efficiency. In a DMFC, the functions of anode and cathode flow field are supply and distribution of methanol solution and air, respectively, to the electrodes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The distribution of the fuel on the electrode surface should ideally be as uniform as possible to ensure a uniform performance across the electrode surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methanol crossover causes mixed potential resulting in lowering of cell voltage, lowering of fuel and system efficiency. In a DMFC, the functions of anode and cathode flow field are supply and distribution of methanol solution and air, respectively, to the electrodes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The distribution of the fuel on the electrode surface should ideally be as uniform as possible to ensure a uniform performance across the electrode surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different flow field designs have different resistances due to non-equal contact area between the electrode and the flow field plate [17]. Also different fabrication torques result in different contact resistances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the fabricating torque gradually generates lowers contact resistance for all the flow field designs. Following the suggestions of Jung et al [17] the fabrication torque of the cell was maintained at a constant value of 40 kgf cm for all the tested designs. Therefore, the effect on contact resistance due to different flow field combinations on the cell performance can be neglected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jung et al [19] and Park et al [20] studied the effect of cathode flow field on cell performance. Serpentine flow field performs better than parallel and grid flow fields due to high pressure drop and effective removal of water produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%