2020
DOI: 10.22186/jyi.38.6.61-66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cat and Dog Interactions on Urban Wildlife Admitted to a Wildlife Center in Wisconsin

Abstract: kittens per litter (Burton and Dobler, 2004), each of which can be a threat to wildlife. There has not been much research on how domestic dogs in the United States affect wild animals. Dogs can cause physical injury, nest destruction, and death to wildlife animals (Forrest and Cassady, 2006). They can also harass or chase endemic species, which results in increased stress and energetically costly behavior among native wildlife (Lenth, 2008). A survey conducted in 2016 by the American Pet Products Association e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a WRC in Tennessee, 20% of cases were due to interactions with domestic pets, 14% were cat-related, and 6% were with dogs. In a WRC in Madison, Wisconsin, dog and cat interactions accounted for 9.7% and 5.6%, respectively, of small mammal and bird admissions, with birds admitted more commonly because of cat interactions and mammals because of dog interactions [ 88 ]. In Canada, cat attacks accounted for 23% and 13% of bird and mammal admissions, respectively, in one study [ 6 ] and, more recently, 6% of overall admissions to WRCs [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a WRC in Tennessee, 20% of cases were due to interactions with domestic pets, 14% were cat-related, and 6% were with dogs. In a WRC in Madison, Wisconsin, dog and cat interactions accounted for 9.7% and 5.6%, respectively, of small mammal and bird admissions, with birds admitted more commonly because of cat interactions and mammals because of dog interactions [ 88 ]. In Canada, cat attacks accounted for 23% and 13% of bird and mammal admissions, respectively, in one study [ 6 ] and, more recently, 6% of overall admissions to WRCs [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all studies with available data, mammals and birds are admitted throughout the year because of cat and dog interactions. More cat and dog attacks were seen at a WRC in Wisconsin in the breeding seasons in the spring and summer, and fledgling birds were also being admitted more frequently than adults and hatchling birds [ 88 ], suggesting vulnerability when first leaving the nest. Another study in the USA in Virginia, however, found that although cat interactions were most frequent in juvenile mammals (40.5%), compared to neonates (34%) and adults (25.5%), in birds, adults with cat injuries were more frequently admitted to the WRC (42.7%) than juveniles (37.2%) or nestlings (20.1%) [ 89 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we have referred to cats as the “victims” of dog bite injuries, but it should be noted that cats can also be attackers in animal bite events. Native animals, such as small mammals and birds, may fall victim to free-ranging cats [ 33 , 34 ]. The injury patterns of cat bite wounds in these wild animals and the identification of feline DNA are worth studying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is estimated that there are more owned cats than dogs in Canada (7.9 million cats and 5.9 million dogs [31]), the relative population size difference is insufficient to account for the significant disparity in batinteraction rate between dogs and cats. Significant predation impacts of cats on bats are evident from meta-analyses [18,[32][33][34][35][36], wildlife rehabilitation data [17,[37][38][39], and feral cat diet studies [40][41][42]. Even single cats can have substantial impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%