Effects of Cardiac Telerehabilitation During COVID-19 on Cardiorespiratory Capacities in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to the closure of most cardiac therapy centers. One of the solutions was to adapt the existing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in an institute to a remote approach offered by home-based telerehabilitation. The aim of this study was to measure the cardiorespiratory effects of telerehabilitation compared to conventional center-based CR.MethodsPatients were assigned to two 3-week CR programs: telerehabilitation and conventional center-based CR. The telerehabilitation group wore a connected watch to monitor heart rate (HR) and gave their perception of effort according to a modified Borg scale. The exercise training (four sessions/week) consisted of 1-h aerobic endurance and strength training session at the target HR zone determined by results based on cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and perception of effort, respectively. The exercise protocol was the same for conventional CR participants except the duration of session that lasted 2 h instead of one. The week before and after the training program, peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), oxygen uptake at first ventilatory threshold (VO2 at VT1), peak workload, percent of predicted maximum HR, and the absolute differences in HR and systolic blood pressure between maximum and recovery at 1 and 3 min were measured using a CPET. A two-way ANOVA with one repeated measure and one independent factor was performed.ResultsFifty-four patients (mean age: 61.5 ± 8.6 years, 10 women) equally split in the two groups were included in this experiment. A significant increase was observed in both groups on VO2 peak (telerehabilitation: 8.1 ± 7.8% vs. conventional: 10.1 ± 9.7%, p < 0.001), VO2 at VT1 (telerehabilitation: 8.8 ± 4.4% vs. conventional: 7.3 ± 19.0%, p = 0.02) and peak workload (telerehabilitation: 16.6 ± 18.9% vs. conventional: 17.2 ± 7.0%, p < 0.001) after the 3-week telerehabilitation and conventional CR, respectively. No significant difference was noticed between both groups.ConclusionA 3-week exercise program improved patients’ cardiorespiratory fitness. Telerehabilitation was as effective and represents a safe alternative CR program during the COVID-19 period. In the future, this approach could facilitate the continuity of care for patients unable to participate in center-based CR.

Management of Long COVID—The CoviMouv' Pilot Study: Importance of Adapted Physical Activity for Prolonged Symptoms Following SARS-CoV2 Infection

“…Our results are comparable to other studies that showed equal benefits of home-based telerehabilitation in comparison with center-based rehabilitation (Maddison et al, 2019;Batalik et al, 2020;Fanget et al, 2022). Furthermore, people with prolonged post-COVID symptoms have often demonstrated reduced exercise capacity (VO 2 values ≤85% of predicted values).…”

Nurses’ Perception of, and Barriers to, Delivering Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients: A National Survey in Saudi Arabia

“…Our study reported that the most common barrier affecting the referral of HF patients for CR from the perspectives of nurses was the lack of CR centers. There is only one CR center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia specifically for patients with cardiovascular diseases, including HF [ 16 , 27 ]. This scenario shows and highlights the urgent need or requirement to create and develop new CR programs that meet global standards and can help existing HF patients across the country.…”

Kangyi Qiangshen Gong exercise prescription for pulmonary function and quality of life in patients recovered from COVID-19: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…The Modified Borg Scale [ 32 ] will be used to assess the dyspnea symptoms and physical health. The participants will be required to walk for 6 min in a corridor with the distance of 30 m and to fill in the questionnaire or to describe verbally of the degree of dyspnea.…”