2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-010-0133-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Caragana microphylla patch and its canopy size on “islands of fertility” in a Mongolian grassland ecosystem

Abstract: In arid and semiarid regions, variations in ''islands of fertility'' accompanied by discontinuous vegetation is frequently observed. However, the effects of vegetation patches on soil, including the influence of canopy size, are not fully understood, particularly under conditions of severe grazing. We examined the effects of patches of mound-forming shrub, Caragana microphylla, and the plant's canopy size on these islands of fertility in a heavily grazed Mongolian grassland. In 11 patches with various canopy s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in clay content were striking, as average clay content was 4.5% for grass patches and 25% for shrub patches, which was in part attributed to overland flow and windblown sediment trapped by shrub patches. The above results were consistent with previous studies (e.g., Zhang et al, 2006b; Kondo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Differences in clay content were striking, as average clay content was 4.5% for grass patches and 25% for shrub patches, which was in part attributed to overland flow and windblown sediment trapped by shrub patches. The above results were consistent with previous studies (e.g., Zhang et al, 2006b; Kondo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…; Kondo et al. ) would moderate its competitive effects on herbaceous plant density (Franco‐Pizaña et al. ; Gómez‐Aparicio et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, competition for light, water and nutrients should decrease them (Facelli & Temby 2002;Weedon & Facelli 2008). Although we did not measure the survival and growth of herbaceous plants, the soil fertilization by C. microphylla (Cao et al 2011;Kondo et al 2012) would moderate its competitive effects on herbaceous plant density (Franco-Pizaña et al 1996;G omez-Aparicio et al 2004). On the other hand, the accumulation of coarse sand, which retains less water and nutrients than fine soil (Ekwoanya & Ojanuga 2002), must inhibit plant emergence and growth on shrub mounds (Li et al 2009).…”
Section: Effects At the Individual Shrub Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size and architecture of pioneer shrubs play important roles in modifying microenvironment (Bonanomi et al ; Pugnaire et al ). Larger canopy shrubs could greatly affect the enrichment of total soil carbon, nitrogen, and water availability but have no effect on non‐limiting elements, such as exchangeable sodium (Kondo et al ). On the other hand, small canopy shrubs may allow more light penetration and less competition for soil nutrients and water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%