1987
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90057-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of busulfan on murine spermatogenesis: cytotoxicity, sterility, sperm abnormalities, and dominant lethal mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
166
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
166
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sertoli cells constitute only 3% of the wild-type testis cell population (31) and are more difficult to target in the wild-type testis than in the infertile testis. Because the number of Sertoli cells remains constant in the adult testis and is not affected by busulfan treatment (2,32), the elimination of germ cells increased the relative concentration of Sertoli cells in the testis cell population. Second, Sertoli cells are the only cells that would be directly exposed to injected adenovirus, because other types of cells are separated by the blood-testis barrier between Sertoli cells (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sertoli cells constitute only 3% of the wild-type testis cell population (31) and are more difficult to target in the wild-type testis than in the infertile testis. Because the number of Sertoli cells remains constant in the adult testis and is not affected by busulfan treatment (2,32), the elimination of germ cells increased the relative concentration of Sertoli cells in the testis cell population. Second, Sertoli cells are the only cells that would be directly exposed to injected adenovirus, because other types of cells are separated by the blood-testis barrier between Sertoli cells (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The administration of the anticancer drug busulfan caused severe reduction in the number of spermatogenic cells within 8 weeks, but spermatogenesis recovered from the damage during the next 12 weeks (Figure 4A), as reported previously. 21 Annexin V or control reagents were microinjected into the seminiferous tubules 8 weeks after treatment with busulfan so that the reagents could affect spermatogenesis from the beginning of recovery, and the testes were analyzed for the occurrence of spermatogenesis at week 20 ( Figure 4B). We found that the histology of the testis sections prepared from annexin Vinjected mice was almost equal to that obtained at week 8. This indicates that spermatogenesis did not recover from the damage caused by busulfan when testes received microinjection of annexin V. Injection of either buffer alone or BSA did not influence the recovery of spermatogenesis.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Sperm Production In Annexin V-treated Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 After 8 weeks, the mice were microinjected with annexin V, BSA or buffer alone. Epididymides were isolated, soaked in M2 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 0.5% BSA, and disrupted with forceps.…”
Section: Analysis Of Epididymal Spermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recipient mice are treated with busulfan to destroy endogenous spermatogenesis (Bucci & Meistrich, 1987). This allows transplanted spermatogonia to reach the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule (Brinster & Avarbock, 1994).…”
Section: Mice and Cell Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%