2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-010-0030-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Broadcasting Conspecific and Heterospecific Calls on Detection of Marsh Birds in North America

Abstract: Standardized protocols that include the use of call-broadcast have recently been proposed for marsh birds in North America. We used data from point-count surveys collected across North America over eight years to evaluate the extent to which each of 13 focal marsh bird species responded to conspecific and heterospecific call-broadcast relative to passive survey methods. Surveyors detected more individuals during the 1-minute of conspecific callbroadcast compared to each of the five 1-minute passive segments an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the species above, studies reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of call-broadcast at increasing vocalization probability of the bitterns. Call-broadcast increased the number of American Bitterns (Botaurus lentiginosus) detected by 240% in South Dakota (Allen et al 2004), and by 295% and 52%-59% in New York (Conway and Gibbs 2001;Lor and Malecki 2002), but did not increase numbers detected in other studies (Cashen 1998;Conway and Gibbs 2005;Conway and Nadeau 2010). Similarly, call-broadcast increased vocalization probability of Least Bitterns (Lxyobrychus exilis) by 140% and 80% in New York (Swift et al 1988;Bogner and Baldassarre 2002) and by 750% in Maine (Gibbs and Melvin 1993), but had little effect in other studies (Cashen 1998;Lor and Malecki 2002;Conway and Gibbs 2005;Tozer et al 2007;Soehren et al 2009;Conway and Nadeau 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the species above, studies reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of call-broadcast at increasing vocalization probability of the bitterns. Call-broadcast increased the number of American Bitterns (Botaurus lentiginosus) detected by 240% in South Dakota (Allen et al 2004), and by 295% and 52%-59% in New York (Conway and Gibbs 2001;Lor and Malecki 2002), but did not increase numbers detected in other studies (Cashen 1998;Conway and Gibbs 2005;Conway and Nadeau 2010). Similarly, call-broadcast increased vocalization probability of Least Bitterns (Lxyobrychus exilis) by 140% and 80% in New York (Swift et al 1988;Bogner and Baldassarre 2002) and by 750% in Maine (Gibbs and Melvin 1993), but had little effect in other studies (Cashen 1998;Lor and Malecki 2002;Conway and Gibbs 2005;Tozer et al 2007;Soehren et al 2009;Conway and Nadeau 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Many past studies identified factors that influence detection probability of marsh birds; these issues are summarized in the following sections. (Erwin et al 2002;Lor and Malecki 2002;Allen et al 2004;Conway et al 2004;Conway and Gibbs 2005;Pierluissi 2006;DesRochers et al 2008;Soehren et al 2009;Conway and Nadeau 2010). In contrast to the species above, studies reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of call-broadcast at increasing vocalization probability of the bitterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we included year in the abundance process to account for known or suspected changes in abundance across years (e.g., Tozer 2013) and survey interval in the detectability process to account for known differences in detectability between intervals before, during, and after conspecific call broadcasts (Conway and Nadeau 2010). As the main focus of the study, we included wind, temperature, cloud, date, daylight, and time of day in the availability and detectability processes to describe daily, seasonal, and weather-related variation in availability and detectability.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the sight of the Least Grebe (Tachy baptus dominicus) is considered to be uncommon in the region (OrtegaÁlvarez 2013). In a similar way, the unique observation that we had of the Sora (Porzana carolina) was notable because certain species of waterfowl, like some from the Ra llidae family, are elusive, cryptic and difficult to watch; therefore the studies of their abundance can be complemented with other techniques like recorded calling playback (Brambilla andJenkins 2009, Conway andNadeau 2010). These observations suggest that this wetland offers specific characteristics to rare species, which increase its ecological value.…”
Section: Hernández-colina Et Almentioning
confidence: 67%