2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of brine valency and concentration on oil displacement by spontaneous imbibition: An interplay between wettability alteration and reduction in the oil-brine interfacial tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same ethanol–water ratios, the tube wettability also demonstrated its influence on the displacement dynamics. Less hydrophilic system (Package II – hydrophobic cases) retarded the v and the dynamics process terminated at longer time ( t ∼ 10 s → t ∼ 100 s for 60% ethanol mixture), as it contributed to a decrease in a driving capillary force, , assuming an increase in the θ. The hydrophilicity influence observed is similar to that of previous work by Lee et al Uneven or fluctuate-like plots in hydrophobic are thought to be due to chemical heterogeneity on the hydrophobized tube surface, where crude oil components were adsorbed, as confirmed by surface imaging using atomic force microscopy (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same ethanol–water ratios, the tube wettability also demonstrated its influence on the displacement dynamics. Less hydrophilic system (Package II – hydrophobic cases) retarded the v and the dynamics process terminated at longer time ( t ∼ 10 s → t ∼ 100 s for 60% ethanol mixture), as it contributed to a decrease in a driving capillary force, , assuming an increase in the θ. The hydrophilicity influence observed is similar to that of previous work by Lee et al Uneven or fluctuate-like plots in hydrophobic are thought to be due to chemical heterogeneity on the hydrophobized tube surface, where crude oil components were adsorbed, as confirmed by surface imaging using atomic force microscopy (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To elucidate such a fluid displacement, many physical and interfacial properties are considered, e.g., fluid viscosity (μ), fluid density, fluid–fluid interfacial tension (σ), and fluid–fluid–solid wettability. Since Bell and Cameron, a fundamental and yet simple experiment on a 1D capillary tube has long been investigated to observe the fluid displacement behaviors with associated interfacial phenomena. This kind of study allows opaque and highly complex fluid flows in subsurface to be elucidated through visualization, although more elaborate examinations at higher dimensions and scales have to be conducted to better understand the flows. Recent studies on influences of the σ and μ were investigated, of which the findings are that dynamic fluid displacement is accordingly enhanced by the former but decelerated by the latter. , One crucial factor that has always been considered is wettability, ,, which are of interest in several studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiently exploiting such unconventional, poor properties of reservoir characteristics (e.g., low porosity and low permeability , ) is normally realized with advanced production techniques deployed. Owing to the “tight” character of unconventional oils, the confined and connected pore-throat networks in reservoir formation are undoubtedly controlled by a capillarity, of which the reservoir fluids flow under a primary influence of capillary pressure acting upon due to the nature of the rock–fluid–fluid interactions. Most efforts therefore focus on how to manipulate such a capillary pressure to improve the oil flow and lead to enhanced oil recovery, while the production technique of interest is the widely implemented “huff-n-puff” technique . The huff-n-puff technique is a process to stimulate tight reservoirs in cycles by using only a signal well for both fluid-injecting (hence “huff”) and oil-producing (hence “puff”) purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an oil-wet system, the capillary force between the oil and the porous rock matrix is stronger, compared to those in a water-wet system. This mean that the oil is held more tightly within the rock’s pores, due to capillary pressure . As the IFT between the oil and the displacing fluid is reduced, it weakens the capillary forces, allowing the oil to be displaced more easily, which leads to an increase in oil recovery factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mean that the oil is held more tightly within the rock's pores, due to capillary pressure. 19 As the IFT between the oil and the displacing fluid is reduced, it weakens the capillary forces, allowing the oil to be displaced more easily, which leads to an increase in oil recovery factor. In addition, in an oil-wet system, the rock surface has a greater affinity for oil, compared to water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%