2007
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.4.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Brine Immersion and Electrode Contact Type Low Voltage Ohmic Thawing on the Physico-chemical Properties of Pork Meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were no differences in moisture content among various brine treatments at 3.8 V/cm. In general, brine-immersion-type ohmic processing as a meat thawing technique did not change the meat color after treatment, which was also confirmed in our previous work (Hong et al, 2007). Nevertheless, migration of NaCl from brine to pork surface was likely manifested as a slight difference of pork qualities based on salinity.…”
Section: Quality Of Frozen Pork Thawed By Ohmic Processsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there were no differences in moisture content among various brine treatments at 3.8 V/cm. In general, brine-immersion-type ohmic processing as a meat thawing technique did not change the meat color after treatment, which was also confirmed in our previous work (Hong et al, 2007). Nevertheless, migration of NaCl from brine to pork surface was likely manifested as a slight difference of pork qualities based on salinity.…”
Section: Quality Of Frozen Pork Thawed By Ohmic Processsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A homemade ohmic device, as described in our previous study (Hong et al, 2007), was employed to evaluate the ohmic process (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Ohmic Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of thawing of meat products by ohmic thawing process, the process is rapid, energy effective, and does not produce any waste water (Halden, DE Alwis, & Fryer, 1990;Palaniappan & Sastry, 1991a;Henderson, 1993;Zhang & Fryer, 1993;Wang, 1995;Roberts et al, 1996;Icier et al, 2014). Studies in open literature have reported that the ohmic thawing resulted in lower drip losses and preserved color values better than conventional thawing methods (Wang, Chen, & Hua, 2002;Hong et al, 2007;Bozkurt & Icier, 2012;Celebi & Icier, 2014). In addition, they reported that microbial growth in meat product thawed ohmically was relatively lower than those thawed by conventional methods.…”
Section: Hoffmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of thawing conditions are cited in literature, the most common of which is thawing under refrigeration (Ambrosiadis and others 1994; AMSA 1995; FDA 2005; USDA‐FSIS 2005; Lee and others 2007). Other methods include thawing at room temperature (RT) (Moody and others 1978; Mitchell and others 1991; Lee and others 2007), in cold water (Boccard and others 1981; Boles and Swan 2002), in tap water (Khan and Lentz 1977), in hot water (Shrestha and others 2009), using microwaves (Moody and others 1978; Mitchell and others 1991; Ambrosiadis and others 1994; Kondratowicz and others 2008), heat convection (Hong and others 2007), infrared (Hong and others 2009), radio frequency (Farag and others 2009), impingement (Anderson and Singh 2006), ohmic (Hong and others 2007), pressure (Zhao and others 1998; Cheftel and others 2000), and thawing by cooking (Berry and others 1971; Moody and others 1978; Honikel 1998). Of these, thawing at refrigerated temperatures, immersion in running cold water, microwave thawing, and cooking from a frozen state conform to safe thawing practices as defined by the U.S. Dept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%