2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Both Methyl and Pyrimidine Groups in Fe–Ag Spin-Crossover Hofmann-Type Complex {Fe(4-Methylpyrimidine)2[Ag(CN)2]2}

Abstract: The spin-crossover (SCO) phenomenon is an active area of research. This paper describes the synthesis of an Fe−Ag Hofmann-type complex, {Fe(4methylpyrimidine) 2 [Ag(CN) 2 ] 2 }, which demonstrates a one-step SCO and single-layer Hofmann-type structure with Ag−N interactions and no Ag−Ag interactions, which is strikingly different from the previously synthesized complex {Fe(4-methylpyrimidine) 2 [Au-(CN) 2 ] 2 } that contains Au−Au interactions and no Au−N interactions. This difference can be explained in terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nice similar example is complexes based on 4-methylpyrimidine of the composition [Fe­(4-methylpyrimidine) 2 [M I (CN) 2 ] 2 ] (where M I = Ag, Au), where the Ag analogue has a lower transition temperature than the Au analogue. In that case, the difference is also explained from the viewpoint of different crystal packing effects: the presence of M···M interactions, M···N contacts, and other structural features. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A nice similar example is complexes based on 4-methylpyrimidine of the composition [Fe­(4-methylpyrimidine) 2 [M I (CN) 2 ] 2 ] (where M I = Ag, Au), where the Ag analogue has a lower transition temperature than the Au analogue. In that case, the difference is also explained from the viewpoint of different crystal packing effects: the presence of M···M interactions, M···N contacts, and other structural features. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In that case, the difference is also explained from the viewpoint of different crystal packing effects: the presence of M•••M interactions, M•••N contacts, and other structural features. 24,67 Because of spin−orbit interaction, the experimental value of χ M T for the HS state of both complexes is higher than the calculated value based on the spin of Fe(II) and equal to ∼3.1−3.5 cm 3 K mol −1 . These χ M T values are typical for most of the Fe(II) Hofmann-like clathrates reported previously (∼3.0−3.8 cm 3 K mol −1 ).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is bridged by square planar tetra-coordinated divalent cyanometalate [M(CN) 4 ] 2− (M = Ni, Pd, Pt) 3–10 such as Fe(pz)[M(CN) 4 ]·H 2 O (M = Ni, Pd, Pt), 10 while the other is bridged by linear coordinated monovalent cyanometalate [M(CN) 2 ] − (M = Ag, Au). 11–16 The first complex possessing the latter type of structure is [Cd(4,4′-bpy) 2 {Ag(CN) 2 } 2 ], 17 while the second is [Cd(py) 2 {Ag(CN) 2 } 2 ], 18,19 which were both reported by Soma and Iwamoto, and therefore, the latter type of structures are denoted as “Soma–Iwamoto types”. Coordination polymer frameworks of Hofmann-type ML 2 M′(CN) 4 (M′ = Ni, Pd, Pt) structures are different from that of the Soma–Iwamoto type ML 2 [M′′(CN) 2 ] 2 (M′′ = Ag, Au).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Among the most well-studied spin-crossover frameworks (SCOFs) are a set of Hofmann-type 3D lattices with the general formula Fe II (pz)­[M II (CN) 4 ], composed of Fe­(II) tetracyanometallate layers (where M II = Ni, Pd or Pt) connected through apically coordinated pyrazine (pz) linkers. , Like other SCO systems, the octahedral ligand field-induced d-orbital splitting energy of the open shell d 6 Fe sites is close to the electron pairing energy. This engenders parallel stability of the low-spin (LS) and high-spin (HS) states and a propensity to switch between the two in response to external stimuli (e.g., temperature or light).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements clearly established the overall SCO behavior and in situ diffraction studies tracked the corresponding long-range structure changes in these SCOFs, yet these measurements do not fully capture local electronic and structural changes associated with spin transition at the Fe sites. Mossbauer spectroscopy is a valuable tool for studying Fe-based SCO systems, , but isotopic labeling, cryogenic temperatures, and/or very long data acquisition times are often required to produce the data quality needed for deeper electronic structure insight beyond spin state assignment, particularly for lower-concentration Fe samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%