2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of boating activities on aquatic vegetation in the Stockholm archipelago, Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sedimentation on eggs and larvae increases mortality (e.g., Auld and Schubel 1978), we consider indirect effects via changes in vegetation to be the most likely mechanism for degrading the production potential of fish reproduction habitats. Shoreline constructions and associated boating reduce vegetation cover, height, and species richness, most likely via resuspension of surface sediments and associated increases in turbidity (Eriksson et al 2004;Sandström et al 2005). Structural habitat complexity provides protection from predation and increases food abundance (Grenouillet and Pont 2001), and the physical changes following boating activities can thus be expected to reduce the quality of the fish reproduction habitat (Sandström et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although sedimentation on eggs and larvae increases mortality (e.g., Auld and Schubel 1978), we consider indirect effects via changes in vegetation to be the most likely mechanism for degrading the production potential of fish reproduction habitats. Shoreline constructions and associated boating reduce vegetation cover, height, and species richness, most likely via resuspension of surface sediments and associated increases in turbidity (Eriksson et al 2004;Sandström et al 2005). Structural habitat complexity provides protection from predation and increases food abundance (Grenouillet and Pont 2001), and the physical changes following boating activities can thus be expected to reduce the quality of the fish reproduction habitat (Sandström et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the increased population, together with a change in recreational habits, has led to an increase in boating and associated construction of jetties and marinas, as well as dredging to gain access by boat to shallow shores. Recreational boating and ferry traffic have been shown to lead to a decrease in vegetation cover and change in the composition of the submerged vegetation community (Eriksson et al 2004), which can adversely affect the juvenile fish community that utilizes these shallow, sheltered areas for reproduction, i.e., as spawning and nursery areas (Jude and Pappas 1992;Sandström et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of sediment disturbance in the Lough can also explain the better sorting of particles, with an increase of the silt/clay fraction in the inner Lough and a decrease in the outer Lough, in comparison with 1992, that was also reflected in the distribution of A. tamarense cysts. Boat-generated disturbance has been shown to affect macrobenthic fauna (Bishop & Chapman, 2004) and macroscopic vegetation (Eriksson et al, 2004) by increased wave action, turbidity and removal of sediment. Besides increasing germination potential of cysts, disturbance increases turbidity in the water column potentially affecting the growth and survival of A. tamarense motile cells and reducing cyst production.…”
Section: Cyst Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suboptimal irradiance triggers extensive morphological (shade-tolerance) (Barko et al 1982, Pilon and Santamaría 2001, Asaeda et al 2004) and architectural (shade-avoidance) (Goldsborough and Kemp 1988, Asaeda et al 2004, Wolfer et al 2006 modifications with the aim of boosting the capture of radiation. Mechanical disturbance also can significantly affect the distribution of macrophytes, mostly affecting their morphological and habitual properties (Eriksson et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%