2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05967-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of blocked vs. interleaved administration mode on saccade preparatory set revealed using pupillometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reconciling this discrepancy, we note that previous work examined pro-and anti-saccades in separate blocks, whereas the current work randomly interleaved task-type on a trialby-trial basis-a necessary manipulation to prevent TEPD attenuation due to task predictability [26]. As such, the current paradigm not only required the executive demand of response suppression for antisaccade trials, but also the executive component of cognitive flexibility (i.e., task-switching) across antisaccades and prosaccades [13,23,27]. Furthermore, and given that cognitive flexibility and task-switching efficiency elicits a robust postexercise benefit [4,28], it is possible that the postexercise decrease in prosaccade RTs observed here reflects a global benefit to executive function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reconciling this discrepancy, we note that previous work examined pro-and anti-saccades in separate blocks, whereas the current work randomly interleaved task-type on a trialby-trial basis-a necessary manipulation to prevent TEPD attenuation due to task predictability [26]. As such, the current paradigm not only required the executive demand of response suppression for antisaccade trials, but also the executive component of cognitive flexibility (i.e., task-switching) across antisaccades and prosaccades [13,23,27]. Furthermore, and given that cognitive flexibility and task-switching efficiency elicits a robust postexercise benefit [4,28], it is possible that the postexercise decrease in prosaccade RTs observed here reflects a global benefit to executive function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, antisaccades provide the necessary resolution to detect subtle post exercise improvements in executive function (i.e., decreased reaction times (RT)) across a range of exercise intensities and durations in healthy young and older adults, as well as those at risk for cognitive decline [11,12]. Third, the pupil size changes observed in the antisaccade task provide a proxy for task-dependent changes in executive function (i.e., inhibitory control) and cognitive/psychological arousal [7,13,14]. Indeed, the locus coeruleus (LC) receives direct-and indirect-input from the prefrontal cortex and the insula, which in turn influence the efferent gain throughout the cortical and subcortical regions, serving sensorimotor and cognitive processing [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to both of these as “saccades” throughout. We included both microsaccades and saccades, which are known to have different properties (e.g., the former is involuntary but the latter is voluntary) [141, 142], because previous studies show that a similar constrictory pupil response is observed following either [48, 49, 50, 52, 51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is substantial support for the common drive hypothesis. A transient pupil constriction and re-dilation locked to saccades was reported in humans as early as the 1960s [48,49,1,50,51,52,53]. Microstimulation of superior colliculus (SC), a subcortical center for saccade generation, evokes a transient pupil response above or below the current level required to evoke a saccade [46,26,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008 ; Ethridge et al. 2009 ; Zeligman and Zivotofsky 2017 ; Ayala and Niechwiej-Szwedo 2021 ). A second type of inhibition involved in anti-saccades is response inhibition, which is defined as the requirement to cancel a previously generated motor plan ( Cutsuridis, Smyrnis, et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%