Effects of Blended Learning in Physical Education among University Students: A Systematic Review

Abstract

(1) Background: Blended learning (BL) models have attracted the attention of university teachers and students worldwide in recent years. However, systematic reviews related to the effectiveness of BL in university physical education are lacking. (2) Purpose: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of BL in physical education among university students. (3) Methods: Searches were conducted in the following five databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies and the quality of this study was fair (range 4–5). (4) Results: All reported sports included basketball (n = 6), badminton (n = 3), dance (n = 3), volleyball (n = 1), yoga (n = 1), aerobics (n = 1), Taiji (n = 1), swimming (n = 1), and tennis (n = 1). Seventeen studies described the effect of BL on students’ motor skills, and the results showed that BL had a greater effect on basic skills, but the improvement was not significant for combination techniques. There were three studies related to physical fitness. Studies have observed significant effects on lung capacity (n = 1), sit and reach (n = 1), pull-ups (n = 1), 1000 m (n = 3), and 800 m (n = 1). However, there was no significant difference in body weight (n = 1) or standing long jump (n = 1). In addition, two articles examined the impact of BL on sitting up, but the findings were the opposite. Six studies reported on exercise attitude and the results demonstrated that BL can significantly improve students’ learning attitude, target attitude, behavioral cognition, and emotional experience. However, the two articles produced different results in behavioral habits. Other results, such as satisfaction and interest in learning, were also popular topics regarding BL and were found to have improved significantly.

Post-pandemic adopted learning approach to promote architectural education: statistical approach

“…For instance, Milovanovi c et al (2020) investigated how to convert the challenges into opportunities to study and apply online learning to emergency architecture. Additionally, the effect of e-learning and blended learning in architectural education was studied by some researchers like (Allu-kangkum, 2021;Boarin et al, 2020;Chandan et al, 2022;Ibrahim et al, 2020;Megahed and Hassan, 2021;Wang et al, 2022) during COVID-19 pandemic.…”

“…, 2022; Ibrahim et al. , 2020; Megahed and Hassan, 2021; Wang et al. , 2022) during COVID-19 pandemic.…”

The effect of wearable technology on badminton learning performance: a multiple feedback WISER model in physical education

“…To encourage greater participation and improve motor skill performance, self-learning activities and peer interaction have been suggested (Østerlie & Mehus, 2020;Hsia et al, 2022). Additionally, analyzing practice videos has been found to enhance physical skill performance (Kok et al, 2020;Nunes et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022).…”

Pengembangan Edukasi Deteksi Dini Penyimpangan Perilaku Emosional Anak Prasekolah dengan Metode Blended Learning pada Guru PAUD

“…Peneltian sebelumnya menunjukkan pendekatan pembelajaran menggunakan metode blended learning efektif digunakan dalam program pendidikan kesehatan karena dapat menghasilkan beberapa perubahan perilaku yang positf, termasuk meningkatkan pengetahuan, dan keterampilan (Wang et al, 2022;Kang & Kim, 2021;Coyle et al, 2019). Adapun metode self-directed learning juga dapat meningkatkan kompetensi belajar Noh & Kim (2019) booklet digunakan sebagai media edukasi pada kelompok kontrol (self-directed learning).…”