1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb07733.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of black scurf (Rhizoctonia solani) on potatoes

Abstract: SUMMARYKing Edward and Majestic seed tubers, selected as ‘clean’ (macroscopically symptomless), moderate and severe according to the extent of black scurf, were planted in field experiments at Rothamsted between 1964 and 1968. Seed infection sometimes delayed plants emerging but did not affect final plant populations. Crops from severely diseased seed yielded, on average, 7% less than ‘clean’ tubers (King Edward 6–8% less and Majestic 0–20% less). Seed infection affected tuber size distribution; compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar yield decreases were found in earlier experiments when whole plots comprised healthy or diseased plants (Hide et al 1973;Griffith et al 1974;Adams & Lapwood 1983) and these reflected both the extent of damage done to the seed tubers or growing plants and their ability to withstand and compensate for damage. The diseases also altered tuber size, and losses in ware yield were respectively 26, 50 and 2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar yield decreases were found in earlier experiments when whole plots comprised healthy or diseased plants (Hide et al 1973;Griffith et al 1974;Adams & Lapwood 1983) and these reflected both the extent of damage done to the seed tubers or growing plants and their ability to withstand and compensate for damage. The diseases also altered tuber size, and losses in ware yield were respectively 26, 50 and 2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, previous research has not identified the most significant source of inoculum. Some studies have shown that seed inoculum is more important in disease development (Banville 1989;Davis 1977;Hide et al 1973;VanEmden 1965); while other studies have shown that soil inoculum is more important (James and McKenzie 1972;Sanford 1937). Additional research has concluded that total inoculum load from all sources is important to disease development and the relative importance of each source cannot be separated out (Bolkan et al 1974;Frank and Leach 1980;Tsror and Perentz-Alon 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When severe, such lesions may girdle the entire circumference, ultimately leading to the pruning of infected stems and stolons. Both stem and stolon canker, therefore, are of economic significance since they can result in malformation of developing daughter tubers (Scholte, 1987), a reduction in yield in some early cultivars (Hide et al, 1989) and uneven emergence that gives rise to non-target size tubers (Hide et al, 1973). Whilst the development of black sclerotia on the skins (black scurf) of harvested tubers has no effect on tuber yield, it can significantly downgrade the marketable value of seed tubers (Jeger et al, 1996) and reduce the saleability of ware to prepack markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%