Effects of Biochar on Yield, Nutrient Recovery, and Soil Properties in a Canola (Brassica napus L)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) Rotation Grown under Controlled Environmental Conditions
“…However, the high P availability in BC-amended soil detected in our study supports the findings of Zhai et al (2015) but contradicts those of Ahmed and Schoenau (2015). The reason for this discrepancy with Ahmed and Schoenau (2015) may be differences in the characteristics of the feedstock used, the pyrolysis process used for BC preparation, or soil temperature conditions. BC derived from various feed stock sources exhibits high variation in nutrient content; thus BC sourced from a different feed stock may show the same or opposite behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…BC also indirectly enhances soil nutrient availability by modifying soil structure, reducing Al 3+ solubility, increasing soil pH, and increasing cation exchange capacity (Martinsen et al, 2014;Waqas et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2014;Butnan et al, 2015). However, the high P availability in BC-amended soil detected in our study supports the findings of Zhai et al (2015) but contradicts those of Ahmed and Schoenau (2015). The reason for this discrepancy with Ahmed and Schoenau (2015) may be differences in the characteristics of the feedstock used, the pyrolysis process used for BC preparation, or soil temperature conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…BC is the product of the slow pyrolysis of biomass, and its properties vary depending on certain factors such as feedstock type, time, and temperature conditions during preparation (de Corato et al, 2015;Gwenzi et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015). However, incorporating BC into soil proved to operate as a conditioner, by improving soil fertility through increasing soil organic C levels and nutrient availability (releasing its own nutrients and cycling existing nutrients in the soil and preventing their leaching), transforming phosphorus (P), enhancing soil field capacity, and decreasing bulk density (Ahmed and Schoenau, 2015;Bayabil et al, 2015;Dong et al, 2015;Gwenzi et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). The large surface area and negative charges of BC immobilize nitrogen (N) and reduce N pollution (Dong et al, 2015).…”
Abstract:We studied the effects of hardwood-derived biochar (BC) and the phytohormone-producing endophyte Galactomyces geotrichum WLL1 in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with respect to basic, macro-and micronutrient uptakes and assimilations, and their subsequent effects on the regulation of functional amino acids, isoflavones, fatty acid composition, total sugar contents, total phenolic contents, and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-scavenging activity. The assimilation of basic nutrients such as nitrogen was up-regulated, leaving carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen unaffected in BC+G. geotrichum-treated soybean plants. In comparison, the uptakes of macro-and micronutrients fluctuated in the individual or co-application of BC and G. geotrichum in soybean plant organs and rhizospheric substrate. Moreover, the same attribute was recorded for the regulation of functional amino acids, isoflavones, fatty acid composition, total sugar contents, total phenolic contents, and DPPH-scavenging activity. Collectively, these results showed that BC+G. geotrichum-treated soybean yielded better results than did the plants treated with individual applications. It was concluded that BC is an additional nutriment source and that the G. geotrichum acts as a plant biostimulating source and the effects of both are additive towards plant growth promotion. Strategies involving the incorporation of BC and endophytic symbiosis may help achieve eco-friendly agricultural production, thus reducing the excessive use of chemical agents.
“…However, the high P availability in BC-amended soil detected in our study supports the findings of Zhai et al (2015) but contradicts those of Ahmed and Schoenau (2015). The reason for this discrepancy with Ahmed and Schoenau (2015) may be differences in the characteristics of the feedstock used, the pyrolysis process used for BC preparation, or soil temperature conditions. BC derived from various feed stock sources exhibits high variation in nutrient content; thus BC sourced from a different feed stock may show the same or opposite behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…BC also indirectly enhances soil nutrient availability by modifying soil structure, reducing Al 3+ solubility, increasing soil pH, and increasing cation exchange capacity (Martinsen et al, 2014;Waqas et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2014;Butnan et al, 2015). However, the high P availability in BC-amended soil detected in our study supports the findings of Zhai et al (2015) but contradicts those of Ahmed and Schoenau (2015). The reason for this discrepancy with Ahmed and Schoenau (2015) may be differences in the characteristics of the feedstock used, the pyrolysis process used for BC preparation, or soil temperature conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…BC is the product of the slow pyrolysis of biomass, and its properties vary depending on certain factors such as feedstock type, time, and temperature conditions during preparation (de Corato et al, 2015;Gwenzi et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015). However, incorporating BC into soil proved to operate as a conditioner, by improving soil fertility through increasing soil organic C levels and nutrient availability (releasing its own nutrients and cycling existing nutrients in the soil and preventing their leaching), transforming phosphorus (P), enhancing soil field capacity, and decreasing bulk density (Ahmed and Schoenau, 2015;Bayabil et al, 2015;Dong et al, 2015;Gwenzi et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). The large surface area and negative charges of BC immobilize nitrogen (N) and reduce N pollution (Dong et al, 2015).…”
Abstract:We studied the effects of hardwood-derived biochar (BC) and the phytohormone-producing endophyte Galactomyces geotrichum WLL1 in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with respect to basic, macro-and micronutrient uptakes and assimilations, and their subsequent effects on the regulation of functional amino acids, isoflavones, fatty acid composition, total sugar contents, total phenolic contents, and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-scavenging activity. The assimilation of basic nutrients such as nitrogen was up-regulated, leaving carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen unaffected in BC+G. geotrichum-treated soybean plants. In comparison, the uptakes of macro-and micronutrients fluctuated in the individual or co-application of BC and G. geotrichum in soybean plant organs and rhizospheric substrate. Moreover, the same attribute was recorded for the regulation of functional amino acids, isoflavones, fatty acid composition, total sugar contents, total phenolic contents, and DPPH-scavenging activity. Collectively, these results showed that BC+G. geotrichum-treated soybean yielded better results than did the plants treated with individual applications. It was concluded that BC is an additional nutriment source and that the G. geotrichum acts as a plant biostimulating source and the effects of both are additive towards plant growth promotion. Strategies involving the incorporation of BC and endophytic symbiosis may help achieve eco-friendly agricultural production, thus reducing the excessive use of chemical agents.
“…Maru et al (2015) showed that in an acidic soil (pH 5.3) co-application of biochar (5 t ha ) with 100% and 75% urea recommendation rates significantly increased nutrient availability (especially P and K) and significantly increased rice growth variables and grain yield. In the study by Ahmed and Schoenau (2015), biochar (1-2 t ha the availability of N and P, and its effects on soil pH, organic carbon and electrical conductivity were minor; it increased the yield of the crops studied only in some treatments. In the study by Schimmelpfennig et al (2015) interactions between the carbon amendments (uncarbonized feedstock, hydrochar, biochar from Miscanthus giganteus) with slurry did not occur, neither improving nor worsening the efficiency of nutrient use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The application of biochar to soil changes its structure as well as the distribution, size and density of pores; it changes soil aeration and water retention capacity. Due to its low susceptibility to biodegradation, porosity and large active surface, biochar added to soil changes its bulk density for several years and increases the net soil surface area and nutrient retention (Ding et al 2010, Spokas et al 2012, Clough et al 2013, Ahmed and Schoenau 2015. This can lead to increased yield potential (with yield increases of 10-12%) (Biederman and Harpole 2013).…”
The food industry faces the problem of soil contamination and consequently the deterioration of the quality of plant products. Here, we present a study on evaluation of the effect of fertilization with sewage sludge (SL) with varying, rates of biochar (BC 2.5, 5 and 10% of DW) on yield quality and the accumulation of heavy metals in wheat grains. The greatest grain yield with the highest content of protein and gluten as well as the highest total content of phenols and flavonoids, was obtained when SL+5%BC fertilization was applied. The addition of 5%BC and 10%BC to SL resulted in the greatest increase in the antioxidant capacity of grain. Among phenolic acids, syringic acid was found in the largest amount in grain in the SL+2.5%BC treatment. A significant decrease in Pb accumulation in wheat grain after application of SL+5%BC and a successive decrease in Al content with increasing BC addition were observed. To increase the quality of wheat grains and to reduce the bioaccumulation of harmful elements after the application of biochar to the soil is important in the context of food safety and health of humans especially in food production on acidic and/or contaminated soils.
Integrated measures including climate‐smart options have been proposed to improve crop production in sub‐Saharan Africa. However, there are limited studies exploiting biochar (BC) use under different cropping systems in the region. We evaluated nutrient uptake, grain and biomass yields, and economic viabilities of integrated use of BC under cereal‐ and legume‐based cropping systems in Ghana. The two‐factor field experiment was conducted in three consecutive cropping seasons and comprised soil amendments (BC, NPK fertilizers, 50% NPK + 50% BC, and control) and cropping systems (sole maize [Zea mays], maize intercropped with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sole soybean and cowpea [Vigna unguiculata L.]). Generally, sole application of mineral fertilizers increased (p < .05) maize grain yield more than the 50% NPK+50% BC. Conversely, the 50% NPK + 50% BC generally produced similar yields (p > .05) of cowpea and soybean as the sole application of the 100% recommended NPK rates. For maize biomass yield, 50% NPK + 50% BC generally outperformed the sole NPK and sole BC treatments. Nutrient uptake in maize was higher in sole NPK and the integrated plots under sole cropping than in intercropping system. Nitrogen uptake of maize in 50% NPK + 50% BC was 12–22% higher in sole cropping than in intercropping system. The value/cost ratio under NPK was above the economic threshold (>2.0) under cropping systems. For 50% NPK + 50% BC, the economic threshold was only exceeded under intercropping cropping system, indicating a considerable intercropping benefits in integrated biochar and mineral fertilizer application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.