2019
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(17)60426-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Bentonite, Hydrogel and Biochar Amendments on Soil Hydraulic Properties from Saturation to Oven Dryness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second experiment showed no effect on the volume of leached solution in response to irrigation water EC (Figure 4A). However, there was a difference (p The lower volume leached with hydrogel application indicates that the polymer favors water retention in sandy soil, as reported in other studies (Dorraji et al, 2010;Mohawesh and Durner, 2017;Yu et al, 2017). Even at the highest salinity of irrigation water (4.5 dS m -1 ), the hydrogel absorbed 70 g g -1 (Figure 3), enough to contribute to soil water retention.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The second experiment showed no effect on the volume of leached solution in response to irrigation water EC (Figure 4A). However, there was a difference (p The lower volume leached with hydrogel application indicates that the polymer favors water retention in sandy soil, as reported in other studies (Dorraji et al, 2010;Mohawesh and Durner, 2017;Yu et al, 2017). Even at the highest salinity of irrigation water (4.5 dS m -1 ), the hydrogel absorbed 70 g g -1 (Figure 3), enough to contribute to soil water retention.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Soil amendments to enhance water holding capacities of a given soil, often in the case of sandy soils, have been investigated in the last decades by several studies [11,15,16]. Some studies also included mathematical modeling of the effects of these soil amendments, including biochar [17,18]. However, most cases involved laboratory experiments, or bare soils without investigating the further impacts of plant growth on biochar amended soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moderate increase of 23% in the ET a of P‐1 (OM and hydrogel), and the large increase of 61% for P‐3 (hydrogel) may be explained by the ability of the hydrogel to retain water, which facilitated evaporation, and/or a high K c value generated by transpiration. Mohawesh and Durner (2019) suggested that soil amendments such as hydrogel improved soil water retentivity across the whole moisture saturation range (from total water availability to water stress conditions) and, also, improved the water availability of the sandy soils for a longer period (almost 22 days). The ET a values achieved in P‐1 and P‐3 (P‐1: 3.71–13.18 mm day¯¹; P‐3: 3.34–15.16 mm day¯¹) exceed the maximum values of Green et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%