1991
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Behavioural State on Visual Processing in Neonates

Abstract: Assessment of visual capacity in full-term neonates as a function of behavioural state was investigated with the luminance flash visual evoked potential (VEP). Infant state (quiet sleep, active sleep, quiet wakefulness, active wakefulness) was determined by behavioural observation and polygraphic recording of EEG, eye movements, electrocardiogram, electromyogram and respiration. VEPs were recorded across the sleep/waking cycle only under carefully defined state conditions. The results indicate that state drama… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are some limiting factors since we have not used monitoring methods, we found a significant influence of the sleep-wakefulness cycle on the latency and amplitude of the major positive component of the F-VEP of the newborn. Our results are in agreement with the finding of Montes-Brown and Apkarian [18,42] who found significant differences in latency and amplitude in awake infants, and with Shepherd et al [43] with respect to the latency of P2 component. In summary, we have focused on the study of the most consistent components of the F-VEP early in life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 96%
“…Although there are some limiting factors since we have not used monitoring methods, we found a significant influence of the sleep-wakefulness cycle on the latency and amplitude of the major positive component of the F-VEP of the newborn. Our results are in agreement with the finding of Montes-Brown and Apkarian [18,42] who found significant differences in latency and amplitude in awake infants, and with Shepherd et al [43] with respect to the latency of P2 component. In summary, we have focused on the study of the most consistent components of the F-VEP early in life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 96%
“…According to the literature there are no clear evidences about the influence of the sleep–wakefulness cycle on the amplitude and latency of evoked potentials in newborns and infants. While several studies reported no differences between ERs recorded in infant during sleep and awake time, for both auditory and visual modalities (Barnet, 1966; Baitch and Levi, 1988; van Sweden et al, 1994) more recent work showed lower amplitudes and longer latencies for P2-N3 in sleep compared to the awake condition (Apkarian et al, 1991; Mercuri et al, 1995; Shepherd et al, 1999; Benavente et al, 2005). This issue should be addressed in future fMEG studies by identifying sleep/awake states of fetuses and neonates and by investigating their influence on habituation of cortical responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although our recordings were performed in awake infants, we found similar optimal stimulus frequencies. Apkarian et al found that flash VEP recordings during sleep differed from those of alert infants with longer peak latencies and smaller amplitudes [2], although longer peak latencies but larger amplitudes have also been reported [36]. Apkarian later observed that the CFF of VEPs was attenuated during sleep, most probably not due to the eye closure, but due to alterations in brain activity in different arousal states [1].…”
Section: Maturation Of Temporal Processing-development Of Flicker Vepsmentioning
confidence: 95%