1988
DOI: 10.1159/000146578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Bacterial Colonization on Mucosal Structure of the Large Bowel of Neonatal Rats

Abstract: Micro-anatomical changes in colonic and caecal epithelia of infant rats between birth and weaning appear to be the outcome of the effects of bacterial colonization, superimposed on the natural postnatal ontogeny of the mucous membranes. Conventional rat pups between 15 and 22 days of age showed development of subepithelial spaces in both caecum and colon, rupture of the overlying epithelium and loss of whole enterocyte plaques. Antibiotic-treated animals retained the large-bowel mucosal morphology of the 10-da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antibodies used in our study are directed against the common framework of the MHC complex in the rat and less specific than the murine antibodies used by Matsumoto et al [26], We have studied the cecum and other areas of the colon and site differences have appeared with epithelial cells of the cecum showing positive staining after conventionali zation while the remaining colon was nega tive. In addition, other authors have also shown that bacterial colonization has an im portant influence of the large bowel mucosa in rats and like us described initial epithelial damage in the cecum [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The antibodies used in our study are directed against the common framework of the MHC complex in the rat and less specific than the murine antibodies used by Matsumoto et al [26], We have studied the cecum and other areas of the colon and site differences have appeared with epithelial cells of the cecum showing positive staining after conventionali zation while the remaining colon was nega tive. In addition, other authors have also shown that bacterial colonization has an im portant influence of the large bowel mucosa in rats and like us described initial epithelial damage in the cecum [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Goblet cells are decreased in specific pathogen free mice in comparison with germ-free ones. Therefore, the formation of intestinal microflora leads to a decrease in the mucin secretion [20]. Thus, the difference in regulation of indigenous bacteria between the basal portions of the mucosal folds in the proximal colon and the middle colon might be caused by other defense factors such as the regulation of the host's mucin secretion, in addition to the regulation of epithelial kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we think that the difference in the period after colonization may be responsible for the difference in expression of IFN-related genes between our study and theirs. The inflammation induced by microbial colonization of GF animals has been known to be only temporary and cease within several weeks [ 62 , 63 ]. After the inflammation is terminated, histological findings return to a state apparently indistinguishable from the normal intestines of mice genuinely harboring the microbes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%