2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of B excess on some physiological and anatomical parameters of ‘Navelina’ orange plants grafted on two rootstocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
57
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This would demonstrate that boron presents a certain phloematic mobility in kiwifruit, according to the conditions of this experiment. This result contrasts with studies by Papadakis et al (2004) and by Sotiropoulos et al (2004), which found an immobility of boron in the phloem of kiwifruit shoots. (BF).…”
Section: Boron Dynamics In Kiwifruit (Experiments 2)contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would demonstrate that boron presents a certain phloematic mobility in kiwifruit, according to the conditions of this experiment. This result contrasts with studies by Papadakis et al (2004) and by Sotiropoulos et al (2004), which found an immobility of boron in the phloem of kiwifruit shoots. (BF).…”
Section: Boron Dynamics In Kiwifruit (Experiments 2)contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Papadakis et al (2004), in a study of boron toxicity in fruit plants, mentioned that orange trees and kiwifruit are species where boron may have restricted phloematic mobility. On the other hand, Sotiropoulos et al (2004) stated that the presence of high concentrations of boron in mature leaves in comparison to young leaves is evidence of boron immobility in the phloem of kiwifruit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rootstock helps the rootstock-scion combination to adapt to different abiotic factors, such as drought, flooding, salinity, mineral deficiency and toxicity, metal toxicity, heat, cold, soil temperature and oxygen, pH etc. (Papadakis et al, 2004;Colla et al, 2010;Hartmann et al, 2013;Savvas et al, 2010;Ghrab et al, 2014;Castle et al, 2016) and different biotic factors such as fungal and bacterial pathogens, virus, diseases, insects or nematodes (Mudge et al, 2009;Shokrollah et al, 2009;Roistacher et al, 2010;Louws et al, 2010;Castle et al, 2016). The choice of rootstock depends on its durability to enemies and diseases.…”
Section: Micropropagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, 'Clementine' mandarin and 'Navelina' orange plants grafted on 'sour orange' rootstock proved to be more sensitive to boron excess than those grafted on 'Swingle citrumelo'. This is mainly due to lower absorption of boron from the roots of 'Swingle citrumelo' and to higher boron retention in the stem of this rootstock, resulting in lesser boron accumulation in leaves of the two aforementioned cultivars when they are grafted on 'Swingle citrumelo' (Papadakis et al, 2004a;2004b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each one specific rootstock-scion combination, to adapt to a number of different factors including root-and/or shoot-associated both abiotic [e.g., drought, waterlogging, flooding, salinity, mineral toxicity, mineral deficiency, heavy metal toxicity, heat, cold, low chilling units, low soil temperature, low soil oxygen, wet or poorly drained soils, soils with high calcium carbonate content, high or low soil pH (Papadakis et al, 2004a;2004b;Colla et al, 2010;Hartmann et al, 2013;Savvas et al, 2010;Ghrab et al, 2014;Castle et al, 2016)] and biotic [e.g., fungal and bacterial pathogens, virus and virioid diseases, insect and nematodes (Mudge et al, 2009;Shokrollah et al, 2009;Roistacher et al, 2010;Louws et al, 2010;Castle et al, 2016)]. Furthermore, rootstock can theoretically affect every characteristic of the scion [e.g., overall plant growth, plant shape, fruit shape, fruit weight, fruit color, fruit firmness, content of phytochemicals in fruits and juices and postharvest storability and shelf life of fresh fruits (Ritenour et al, 2004;Rouphael et al, 2010;Orazem et al, 2011;Turhan et al, 2011;Castle et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%