1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90062-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of auxiliary heating on dc electric fields in the TEXTOR boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also observed in many diverted discharges that the measured fluctuation-induced flux is much too high to be consistent with global particle balance (DIII-D tokamak 23 , JET 36,22,26 ). Taken together, the above observations have led to the speculation that (3) there exists some inward particle transport mechanism that does not involve fine scale plasma turbulence such as large stationary convection cells, as suggested in some experiments [37][38][39][40] , and/or (4) there are large corrections that should be made to the fluctuation-induced flux estimate due to finite electron temperature fluctuations that are not being measured in many of these experiments, and/or (5) there exists a large poloidal asymmetry in the turbulent transport (ballooning hypothesis). However, with respect to speculation (4): Recent measurements in the Texas Experimental Tokamak-Upgrade (TEXT-U) 41 and in DIII-D 30 indicate that density and electron temperature fluctuations in the edge plasma tend to be in phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is also observed in many diverted discharges that the measured fluctuation-induced flux is much too high to be consistent with global particle balance (DIII-D tokamak 23 , JET 36,22,26 ). Taken together, the above observations have led to the speculation that (3) there exists some inward particle transport mechanism that does not involve fine scale plasma turbulence such as large stationary convection cells, as suggested in some experiments [37][38][39][40] , and/or (4) there are large corrections that should be made to the fluctuation-induced flux estimate due to finite electron temperature fluctuations that are not being measured in many of these experiments, and/or (5) there exists a large poloidal asymmetry in the turbulent transport (ballooning hypothesis). However, with respect to speculation (4): Recent measurements in the Texas Experimental Tokamak-Upgrade (TEXT-U) 41 and in DIII-D 30 indicate that density and electron temperature fluctuations in the edge plasma tend to be in phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When adjacent field-lines charge to different voltages, there is a perpendicular electric field between them. This gives rise to E × B drifts and the important concept of rf-sheath-induced convection [28][29][30].…”
Section: Antenna (Near-field) Sheaths and Interaction With Edge Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives rise to E×B drifts and the important concept of rfsheath-induced convection. [20][21][22] The effects of rf-induced convection have been seen indirectly in experiments. On JET, reduced particle confinement and increased SOL density scale length during monopole H-modes were attributed to rf-induced convection.…”
Section: Fw Launch Antenna-edge Interactions: Rf Sheathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential is nearly constant along the equilibrium magnetic field but varies rapidly across it. The spatial variation of φ drives rapid E × B convection [12,20,23,24] which increases the flux of plasma to the antenna and thereby enhances the strength of the antenna-plasma interactions. The DC electric fields in the SOL and the convective fluxes have been measured with probes in several experiments (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%