2014
DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.3.4.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Autonomy Supportive vs. Controlling Teachers’ Behavior on Students’ Achievement

Abstract: <p style="text-align:justify">Grolnick and Ryan assume that an autonomy supportive environment leads to higher learner engagement and thus to greater achievements and deeper understanding of content. In school, knowledge acquisition (rote learning as well as conceptual learning) are regarded as most important. In this study, we examined the effects of teachers’ autonomy supportive vs. controlling behavior on knowledge acquisition as measured by reproduction as well as at higher cognitive levels. The samp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Jang, Reeve, and Deci's study (2010), the student engagement rates were positively predicted by the teachers' autonomy support rates, for which they had observers who rated both the teachers' and students' behaviours at the high school level. Similarly, in a study conducted with 7th graders' by Hofferber, Eckes, and Wilde (2014), focusing on rote learning and conceptual learning, the results revealed that the learners who were educated in an autonomy-supportive setting established a higher level of conceptual knowledge compared to the ones educated in a controlling setting. Yet, learners' rote learning did not change in either case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In Jang, Reeve, and Deci's study (2010), the student engagement rates were positively predicted by the teachers' autonomy support rates, for which they had observers who rated both the teachers' and students' behaviours at the high school level. Similarly, in a study conducted with 7th graders' by Hofferber, Eckes, and Wilde (2014), focusing on rote learning and conceptual learning, the results revealed that the learners who were educated in an autonomy-supportive setting established a higher level of conceptual knowledge compared to the ones educated in a controlling setting. Yet, learners' rote learning did not change in either case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…By engaging in these supportive behaviours, teachers would be providing an autonomy-support environment. Autonomy-supportive environments Moreover, an autonomy-supportive environment has a positive effect on diverse students' interest, conceptual learning, achievement, stereotype threat, and overall well-being compared to a more controlling environment (Boggiano et al 1993;Grolnick & Ryan, 1987;Hofferber et al, 2014;Nadler et al, 2016;Patall et al, 2018). Although teachers are typically the source of autonomy support, peers and administrative staff can also support this environment (Rocchi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Self-determination Theory and Classroom Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomy supportive practices allow for students’ perspectives, choices, and interests to be included in the activity, and the value and impact of the activity is made clear to them. Such environments have been found to engender confidence, motivation, engagement, and achievement in students, factors that NISEP has also seen positive changes in among its student leader cohort.…”
Section: Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%