2002
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Automatic Cluster Remover Settings on Average Milking Duration, Milk Flow, and Milk Yield

Abstract: A crossover study design was used in five commercial dairy herds to study the effect of altering the switch point settings for automatic cluster remover units on the average duration of unit attachment, milk flow, and milk yield. Automatic cluster remover switch point settings were alternated, for 1-wk periods, between 0.50 and 0.64 kg/min (1.1 and 1.4 lb/min) in one herd and between 0.73 and 0.82 kg/min (1.6 and 1.8 lb/min) in the four remaining herds. Parlor data were captured at 329 separate milking session… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
30
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of milking duration in T15020 and T20010 agree with those found in similar studies carried out in dairy cows (Sagi, 1978;Stewart et al, 2002;Jago et al, 2010). The use of the AVCD set with T15020 would be more efficient than the conventional milking with manual cluster removal, as it obtained a similar amount of extracted milk but took less time.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of milking duration in T15020 and T20010 agree with those found in similar studies carried out in dairy cows (Sagi, 1978;Stewart et al, 2002;Jago et al, 2010). The use of the AVCD set with T15020 would be more efficient than the conventional milking with manual cluster removal, as it obtained a similar amount of extracted milk but took less time.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The higher probability in the case of T150 that these animals were distributed in different rows caused the increase in the duration of the milking of a row. This situation was described by Stewart et al (2002) who pointed out that the duration of the milking of a row depends on the milking duration of the slowest animals. The absence of significant effects of the treatment on the milk composition agrees with the results observed in dairy cows (Jago et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The effect of ACRs in the milking of dairy cows has been widely studied (Sagi, 1978;Stewart et al, 2002;Jago et al, 2010) testing different settings of this type of devices (milk flow threshold, MF and delay time, DT) and assessing that a suitable setting of them allows reducing milking time employed without losses of milk yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.2 kg/minute, which is commonly used as a baseline setting in experimental studies (Clarke et al 2004), the difference in mean milking time between the two treatments would likely have been greater. This is based on evidence from other studies that have demonstrated signifi cant reductions in milking time when ACR threshold settings were raised (Rasmussen 1993;Stewart et al 2002). However, there is evidence to suggest that the average duration of milking may not decrease in response to an increase in ACR threshold setting when cows are milked under typical conditions for New Zealand.…”
Section: Teat Condition and Mastitismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studies by Rasmussen (1993) and more recently Stewart et al (2002) demonstrated that by raising the threshold setting of the ACR, milking time could be substantially reduced without affecting yield or the incidence and prevalence of subclinical mastitis. Researchers in Australia reported that assigning a maximum milking time resulted in a 34% reduction in the maximum (5), [246][247][248][249][250][251][252]2010 milking time of the slower-milking cows without signifi cant loss of milk yield (Clarke et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%