2021
DOI: 10.1177/03611981211007838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Auditory Display Types and Acoustic Variables on Subjective Driver Assessment in a Rail Crossing Context

Abstract: Highway-rail grade crossings (HRGCs) present multiple collision risks for motorists, suggesting the need for additional countermeasures to increase driver compliance. The use of in-vehicle auditory alerts (IVAAs) at HRGCs has been increasing, but there are limited standards or guidelines on how such alerts should be implemented. In the current study, we sought to investigate the effect of different auditory display variables, such as display type and acoustics, on subjective user assessments. We recruited 24 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCVW system warns drivers if they do not seem to take appropriate actions near the crossing, if the crossing they stopped at is currently active, and the likely presence of trains around. Finally, our research group has also conducted a systemic design of auditory alerts for HRGCs [6,7], showing that hybrid auditory alerts using both speech and non-speech components are preferred for the rail crossing situation.…”
Section: Various Research Groups and Teams Have Started Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RCVW system warns drivers if they do not seem to take appropriate actions near the crossing, if the crossing they stopped at is currently active, and the likely presence of trains around. Finally, our research group has also conducted a systemic design of auditory alerts for HRGCs [6,7], showing that hybrid auditory alerts using both speech and non-speech components are preferred for the rail crossing situation.…”
Section: Various Research Groups and Teams Have Started Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVAAs have been successfully used for rear and forward collision warnings [1,2], intersections [3,4], and take-over alerts in automated vehicles [5]. In the field of rail crossings, IVAAs have been suggested as a method to control and reduce the incidence of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing (HRGC) accidents [6,7]. As these locations present increased risk to drivers due to the lethality of accidents [8] and the incidence of inattentive driving [9], IVAAs present many benefits in increasing safety and alerting drivers on-time for responding to the crossing [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%