2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0519-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Attention and Perceptual Uncertainty on Cerebellar Activity During Visual Motion Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results further highlight the importance of cerebellar network FC in relation to attention problems, and are in line with recent works that have shown that attention relies on a multitude of regions not traditionally ascribed to the canonical attention networks (Rohr, et al, 2018;Rosenberg, et al, 2016). Indeed, in recent years there has been a surge in studies showcasing the cerebellum's role in attention (Baumann and Mattingley, 2014;Kellermann, et al, 2012;Striemer, et al, 2015). Genetic, animal model, post-mortem and neuroimaging studies, have all reported cerebellar differences between individuals with ADHD and those who are TD (Arime, et al, 2011;Baroni and Castellanos, 2015;Bonvicini, et al, 2016;Chess and Green, 2008;Rubia, et al, 2014;van der Meer, et al, 2016), as well as between TD individuals and those with ASD (for reviews see (Becker and Stoodley, 2013;Crippa, et al, 2016;Stoodley, 2016;Wang, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results further highlight the importance of cerebellar network FC in relation to attention problems, and are in line with recent works that have shown that attention relies on a multitude of regions not traditionally ascribed to the canonical attention networks (Rohr, et al, 2018;Rosenberg, et al, 2016). Indeed, in recent years there has been a surge in studies showcasing the cerebellum's role in attention (Baumann and Mattingley, 2014;Kellermann, et al, 2012;Striemer, et al, 2015). Genetic, animal model, post-mortem and neuroimaging studies, have all reported cerebellar differences between individuals with ADHD and those who are TD (Arime, et al, 2011;Baroni and Castellanos, 2015;Bonvicini, et al, 2016;Chess and Green, 2008;Rubia, et al, 2014;van der Meer, et al, 2016), as well as between TD individuals and those with ASD (for reviews see (Becker and Stoodley, 2013;Crippa, et al, 2016;Stoodley, 2016;Wang, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A growing body of literature suggests that in addition to cortico-cortico interactions (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002;Fox, et al, 2006;Rohr, et al, 2017), cortico-cerebellar connectivity may play an important role in attention (Baumann and Mattingley, 2014;Kellermann, et al, 2012;Striemer, et al, 2015). Historically, the human cerebellum has been primarily associated with sensorimotor functions (Heck and Sultan, 2002;Marr, 1969), however, evidence has accumulated regarding its role in working memory, executive functioning, language, emotion and social cognition (Schmahmann, 2010;Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009;Strick, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study voluntary covert attention appeared relatively unaffected by cerebellar damage. This result is consistent with earlier work suggesting that the cerebellum may play less of a role in voluntary attention (Oliver Baumann & Mattingley, 2014; Striemer, Chouinard, et al, 2015). In fact, a previous fMRI study from our lab observed greater BOLD activation in the left cerebellum for reflexive (i.e., peripheral cue) compared to voluntary (i.e., central arrow cue) covert attention tasks in healthy adults (Striemer, Chouinard, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because this effect was in the direction of overreproduction rather than underreproduction of the target intervals, it can also be attributed to the additional effect of the experimental manipulation on switch closure probability. Although participants were instructed not to pay attention to the properties of the RDM stimulus besides its duration (e.g., speed, direction, density), given the close link between attention and the coherence of motion in the highly dynamic RDM stimulus (e.g., Baumann & Mattingley, 2014;Bolandnazar, Lennarz, Mirpour, & Bisley, 2015;Liu, Fuller, & Carrasco, 2006), it is indeed possible that the various levels of coherent motion attracted differential levels of attention paid to the nontemporal properties of the RDM stimulus between encoding and reproduction phases in this experiment. Experiment 3 investigated the potential relationship between the change in the number of eye movements from encoding to reproduction, and the robust behavioral results observed in Experiments 1 and 2 (i.e., reproduced duration).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%