2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on attention and impulsivity in the 5-choice serial reaction time test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
155
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
37
155
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective NET inhibitors such as atomoxetine [(3R)-N-methyl-3-(2-methylphenoxy)-3-phenylpropan-1-amine] and reboxetine [(2S)-2-[(S)-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)-phenylmethyl]morpholine], approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and MDD, respectively, both decrease premature responding of rodents in the 5-CSRTT (Navarra et al, 2008b;Paterson et al, 2011b;Baarendse and Vanderschuren, 2012;Robinson, 2012). In an analogous manner, selective NET inhibitors reboxetine and (1)-oxaprotiline [(1)-3-(9,10-ethano-9,10-dihydro-9-anthryl)-1-methylamino-2-propanol] increased the reinforcement rate, decreased the response rate, and exerted a cohesive rightward shift in the IRT distribution of rats responding on a DRL 72-second schedule Wong et al, 2000;Dekeyne et al, 2002).…”
Section: Rethinking An Empirical Antidepressant Screenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selective NET inhibitors such as atomoxetine [(3R)-N-methyl-3-(2-methylphenoxy)-3-phenylpropan-1-amine] and reboxetine [(2S)-2-[(S)-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)-phenylmethyl]morpholine], approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and MDD, respectively, both decrease premature responding of rodents in the 5-CSRTT (Navarra et al, 2008b;Paterson et al, 2011b;Baarendse and Vanderschuren, 2012;Robinson, 2012). In an analogous manner, selective NET inhibitors reboxetine and (1)-oxaprotiline [(1)-3-(9,10-ethano-9,10-dihydro-9-anthryl)-1-methylamino-2-propanol] increased the reinforcement rate, decreased the response rate, and exerted a cohesive rightward shift in the IRT distribution of rats responding on a DRL 72-second schedule Wong et al, 2000;Dekeyne et al, 2002).…”
Section: Rethinking An Empirical Antidepressant Screenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of adequate dose ranges over adequate 5-CSRTT intertrial intervals tends to show beneficial effects of methylphenidate (methyl 2-phenyl-2-piperidin-2-ylacetate) on the accuracy or omissions, although with increased impulsivity (premature responses) at higher doses (Paine et al, 2007;Navarra et al, 2008b;Paterson et al, 2011a;Robinson, 2012). In rats performing on DRL schedules, methylphenidate also tends to increase response rates and exert cohesive leftward shifts in IRT distributions, especially at higher doses (Seiden et al, 1979;Orduña et al, 2009;Andrzejewski et al, 2014).…”
Section: Rethinking An Empirical Antidepressant Screenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective ADHD treatments, including methylphenidate, amphetamine and atomoxetine, reduce impulsive behaviour, probably by enhancing response inhibition, in rats (Navarra et al 2008). Some studies evaluate both cognitive and motor function of DA-depleted rats after intracerebral neonatal microinjections of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA).…”
Section: Animal Models and The ''Network Inhibition Hypothesis'' Of Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the effects of TAK-063 on impulsivity, variable ITI tests were performed. In these tests, rats must maintain attention for variable durations, and that led to an increase in the baseline levels of premature responses (Navarra et al, 2008;Robinson, 2012). Under these conditions, TAK-063 at 0.3 mg/kg p.o.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 16 rats were used only for characterization of TAK-063 in variable ITI tests at 6 months of age. On the testing day, a fixed ITI schedule was used with 0.5-second stimuli and 5-second ITI to assess attention, and impulsivity was assessed using a variable ITI schedule with 0.5-second stimuli at 4, 5, 7, or 10 seconds (Navarra et al, 2008;Robinson, 2012). Equal numbers of each of the four ITIs were randomly presented over 100 trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%