1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0046002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aspiration and achievement on muscular tensions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would seem that systematic manipulation is necessary if the effects of failure or success are to be more directly and accurately evaluated. Leshner (7) controlled failure by prearranging scores on a given task. The task utilized the verbal solutions of sets of figure-patterns for which fictitious scores and norms were established as a means of reporting and controlling relative achievement.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would seem that systematic manipulation is necessary if the effects of failure or success are to be more directly and accurately evaluated. Leshner (7) controlled failure by prearranging scores on a given task. The task utilized the verbal solutions of sets of figure-patterns for which fictitious scores and norms were established as a means of reporting and controlling relative achievement.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of muscle-action potential (MAP) have shown that several conditions of goal-directed activity increase its amplitude: (a) the duration of the task (Bartoshuk, 1955;Davis, 1937;Smith, 1953;Stennett, 1957); (b) increasing nearness of the goal or of the end of the task (Bartoshuk, 1955;Davis, 1937;Malmo, Shagass, & Davis, 1951;Smith, 1953); (c) the difficulty of the task (Belanger, 1957;Davis, 1938;Shaw & Kline, 1947;Surwillo, 1956); (d) the presence of distracting stimuli (Davis, 1937); (e) the value of the incentive offered to 5 (Surwillo, 1956); (/) the intelligence of S (Shaw & Kline, 1947); and (g) a previous failure, rather than a success, by 5 (Klein, 1951;Leshner, 1961). The latter occurs with task-oriented 5s but not with ego-oriented ones (Reuder, 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%