2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-007-9051-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aspen canopy removal and root trenching on understory microenvironment and soil moisture

Abstract: Effects of three aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) canopy removal treatments and root trenching on understory microenvironment and moisture were tested at Parkland and Boreal sites in Alberta, Canada. Aspen canopies moderated air temperature by reducing maximums and increasing minimums, and increased the frost-free period in the understory by reducing radiative frosts. When daily differences were found among canopy treatments, maximum absolute humidity was greater with complete canopy removal. Maximum daily r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). In addition to the direct physical damage caused by logging, such changes can be attributed to the understory mesoclimate becoming more extreme: thinning or clearcutting can increase the penetration of precipitation and light, increase temperature extremes, and increase wind, potentially leading to greater desiccation stress (Chen, Franklin & Spies ; MacDonald & Thompson ; Powell & Bork ; Simonin et al . ; Ma et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). In addition to the direct physical damage caused by logging, such changes can be attributed to the understory mesoclimate becoming more extreme: thinning or clearcutting can increase the penetration of precipitation and light, increase temperature extremes, and increase wind, potentially leading to greater desiccation stress (Chen, Franklin & Spies ; MacDonald & Thompson ; Powell & Bork ; Simonin et al . ; Ma et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bryophyte species have shown declines after forest thinning or clearcutting (Fenton, Frego & Sims 2003;Caners, Macdonald & Belland 2010;Arseneault, Fenton & Bergeron 2012; but see Cleavitt et al 2008). In addition to the direct physical damage caused by logging, such changes can be attributed to the understory mesoclimate becoming more extreme: thinning or clearcutting can increase the penetration of precipitation and light, increase temperature extremes, and increase wind, potentially leading to greater desiccation stress (Chen, Franklin & Spies 1993;MacDonald & Thompson 2003;Powell & Bork 2007;Simonin et al 2007;Ma et al 2010;Arseneault, Fenton & Bergeron 2012). Such negative impacts (of canopy reduction) can be lessened by the presence of remnant sapling canopy (Fenton & Frego 2005;Arseneault, Fenton & Bergeron 2012), water bodies (Dynesius, Hylander & Nilsson 2009;Baldwin & Bradfield 2010), or woody debris (Fenton & Bergeron 2007;Dynesius, Astr€ om & Nilsson 2008;Pharo & Lindenmayer 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative relationship (r ¼ À0.759, P < 0.01) between SWC and herbage biomass supported the inference. Lesser SWC has also been observed beneath tree canopy (Mordelet et al, 1993;Powell and Bork, 2007) compared to open areas. About 5.6% and 9.3% decrease in SWC in N 10 and N 20 , respectively compared to the N 0 treatment, was due to nitrogen induced soil water use by the growing vegetation.…”
Section: Soil Water Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The establishment of woody vegetation through restoration will have other effects on the ground layer vegetation beyond changes in light availability and soil moisture. The presence of a woody canopy will also reduce wind speeds year‐round, ambient temperatures during summer and the incidence of frost in winter (Powell & Bork ). The presence of woody vegetation will also result in changes in soil structure and nutrient cycling as a result of woody root systems and associated micro flora and fauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%