2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of artificial amendments in potting media on Orthosiphon aristatus growth and development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PAG amendment (0.4%, w/w) also enhanced drought tolerance of citrus plants and prolonged seedling survival under water stress conditions [61]. On the contrary, Nguyen et al [57] observed inability of PAM and UFRF amendments for delaying PWP of Orthosiphon aristatus.…”
Section: Effect On Pwp and Moisture Contentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PAG amendment (0.4%, w/w) also enhanced drought tolerance of citrus plants and prolonged seedling survival under water stress conditions [61]. On the contrary, Nguyen et al [57] observed inability of PAM and UFRF amendments for delaying PWP of Orthosiphon aristatus.…”
Section: Effect On Pwp and Moisture Contentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Alginate amendment also showed comparable results with psyllium and bacterial polymer. Conversely, urea-formaldehyde resin foam (UFRF) and PAG amendment neither shown increase in shoot fresh mass nor in dry weight of Orthosiphon aristatusin [57]. Nikolopoulou et al [58] also observed that turfgrass root dry mass could even reduce upon UFRF amendment.…”
Section: Effect On Germination and Seedling Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roof-tile substrate had the lowest WHC (44%), rather than the scoria substrate (45.9%), and we found that differences in Cumulative ET between the three substrates were better related to their plant available water (PAW). Whilst WHC is often used to describe the maximum amount of stored water and the maximum substrate weight [10,14], it does not necessarily represent water that can be extracted from the media, i.e., PAW [44]. Fassman and Simcock [14] and Stovin et al [26] also found water retention of green roof substrates was better related to PAW than WHC.…”
Section: Effect Of Substrate Physical Properties and Vegetation Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hydrophilic polymer attracted great deal of research attention due to its intriguing properties and applications especially when the product is applied in planting media (Nie et al, 2004 andPeng et al, 2008). This water-absorbing polymer or soil amendment may enhance plant survival through its ability to imbibe large amounts of water and exhibit high permeability to oxygen, nutrients, and water soluble metabolites, particularly in sandy soils (Al-Humaid, 2005, Al-Humaid and Moftah, 2007, Thomas, 2008Nguyen et al, 2009, Beniwal et al, 2010, Beniwal et al, 2011and Guyomard-Lack et al, 2012. In other words, hydrogel functions as an additional water reservoir for the soil-plantair system (Luo et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%