2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-7113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of area deprivation on health risks and outcomes: a multilevel, cross-sectional, Australian population study

Abstract: Aggregated area-level characteristics make modest, but significant independent contributions to smoking, obesity and quality of life, but not for other health outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
69
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is evidence to support an association between neighborhood disadvantage and increased cardiovascular health risk. In an Australian study, 15 for example, arealevel deprivation was associated with obesity and smoking, although no statistically significant association was apparent with diabetes mellitus, at-risk alcohol use, physical activity, or CVD itself. At least 1 study of disease outcomes has reported an increased risk of stroke among whites ≥65 years of age in neighborhoods with the lowest compared with those in neighborhoods with the highest socioeconomic status 21 ; 2 independent ecological studies suggest associations between aspects of neighborhood disadvantage and the risk of stroke 20,22 ; and several studies have shown a link between neighborhood disadvantage and an increased risk of CVD, often independently of adult individual-level socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is evidence to support an association between neighborhood disadvantage and increased cardiovascular health risk. In an Australian study, 15 for example, arealevel deprivation was associated with obesity and smoking, although no statistically significant association was apparent with diabetes mellitus, at-risk alcohol use, physical activity, or CVD itself. At least 1 study of disease outcomes has reported an increased risk of stroke among whites ≥65 years of age in neighborhoods with the lowest compared with those in neighborhoods with the highest socioeconomic status 21 ; 2 independent ecological studies suggest associations between aspects of neighborhood disadvantage and the risk of stroke 20,22 ; and several studies have shown a link between neighborhood disadvantage and an increased risk of CVD, often independently of adult individual-level socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…13 Thus, adult neighborhood disadvantage may drive the link between childhood experiences and adult health, representing a pathway model. An important source of adversity experienced in adulthood is residence in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhood, which has been shown to be associated with CVD risk factors or morbidities such as obesity, 14,15 ischemic heart disease, 16 myocardial infarction,…”
Section: Clinical Perspective On P 379mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their prevalence is linked to deprivation 16 which was included as a confounding factor in the logistic regression model. While this would only partially eliminate their effect, differences in the prevalence of these characteristics between…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used multilevel models. These types of models are also known as hierarchical models because of (1) the structure of the data (e. g. students clustered within schools) and (2) the hierarchy within the model with the parameters of the within-population regressions at the bottom, controlled by hyperparameters, the parameters of the upper-level models. In the first paper 2 , an Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage score (IRDS) was used as an indicator of local area disadvantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%