2014
DOI: 10.2460/javma.245.10.1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of approach and injection volume on diffusion of mepivacaine hydrochloride during local analgesia of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve in horses

Abstract: Results indicated that the proximal and distal diffusion of the mepivacaine-iohexol solution was quite variable following either DBLPN nerve block technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated four different treatment/control groups: (a) eAM, consisting of StemWrap and StemWrap+ products; (b) eAM control, which was potentially subject to the local subcutaneous injection effects of the StemWrap+; (c) commercially available occlusive silicone gel dressings (CICA‐CARE; Smith & Nephew, Andover, Massachusetts) known for their ability to reduce the formation of granulation tissue on the distal limbs of horses as a comparison; and (d) commercially available nonadherent dressings (Telfa; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) as a negative control. The ability of small volumes (2 mL) of subcutaneous injectate to diffuse both proximally and distally in the distal limbs of horses for total distances as far as 11 cm has been documented in many local anesthetic and contrast medium studies . For this reason, we chose not to treat the wound on the same limb as the eAM‐treated wound because it was well within this distance range, and we speculated that it could be influenced by the injection of the eAM‐treated wound.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated four different treatment/control groups: (a) eAM, consisting of StemWrap and StemWrap+ products; (b) eAM control, which was potentially subject to the local subcutaneous injection effects of the StemWrap+; (c) commercially available occlusive silicone gel dressings (CICA‐CARE; Smith & Nephew, Andover, Massachusetts) known for their ability to reduce the formation of granulation tissue on the distal limbs of horses as a comparison; and (d) commercially available nonadherent dressings (Telfa; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) as a negative control. The ability of small volumes (2 mL) of subcutaneous injectate to diffuse both proximally and distally in the distal limbs of horses for total distances as far as 11 cm has been documented in many local anesthetic and contrast medium studies . For this reason, we chose not to treat the wound on the same limb as the eAM‐treated wound because it was well within this distance range, and we speculated that it could be influenced by the injection of the eAM‐treated wound.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No difference in frequency of diffusion to adjacent synovial structures was appreciated between techniques to desensitise the DBLPN (Claunch et al . ). The single‐injection technique for perineural infiltration of the DBLPN was more specific when directly compared with the subtarsal nerve block with less diffusion to surrounding synovial structures (Gayle and Redding ).…”
Section: Part I: Review Of Diagnostic Analgesia Of the Proximal Metatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…) and diffusion to the tarsometatarsal joint in 25% or 6% of cases (Claunch et al . ; Contino et al . ; respectively).…”
Section: Part I: Review Of Diagnostic Analgesia Of the Proximal Metatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations