2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of apical meristem loss on sylleptic branching and growth of hybrid poplar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variations of gene transcription profiles in the outgrowing buds showed a temporal shift proportional to the distance from the cut. This was in agreement with the bud break of inhibited sylleptic buds, which occurred in temporal progression according to the increasing distance from the cut (Zeleznik 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The variations of gene transcription profiles in the outgrowing buds showed a temporal shift proportional to the distance from the cut. This was in agreement with the bud break of inhibited sylleptic buds, which occurred in temporal progression according to the increasing distance from the cut (Zeleznik 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Recent studies show evidence for phenotypic accommodation in a variety of other stem traits, including hydraulics, biomechanics, and biomass accumulation rates (Tateno & Bae 1990; Weitz et al. 2006; Rosell & Olson 2007; Zeleznik 2007). Within species, the question of how ontogenetic buffering mechanisms maintain crown–stem scaling and other vital proportionalities offers a nexus to unite studies of signalling and growth regulation in a single adaptive theme (Niklas 2005; Telewski 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the crown-stem relationship, this ontogenetic buffering includes replacement of lost foliage by rapid shoot growth, and replacement of wounds to the trunk by locally accelerated cambial activity (Hejnowicz 1997;Gibert et al 2006;Kramer 2006;Schulgasser & Witztum 2007). Recent studies show evidence for phenotypic accommodation in a variety of other stem traits, including hydraulics, biomechanics, and biomass accumulation rates (Tateno & Bae 1990;Weitz et al 2006;Zeleznik 2007). Within species, the question of how ontogenetic buffering mechanisms maintain crown-stem scaling and other vital proportionalities offers a nexus to unite studies of signalling and growth regulation in a single adaptive theme (Niklas 2005;Telewski 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Perturbation Plasticity and Universal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not statistically significant, the exclosure experiment supported these field observations with nearly twice the biomass removed along the Lamar during the summer than along the Gardner and fewer stems were consumed during the winter than during the summer. Removal of apical buds during the growing season can have a significant impact on cottonwoods by increasing lateral branching (Zeleznik, ), which may result in a 40% increase in branch biomass (Coyle, Hart, McMillin, Rule, & Hall, ). Stem removal early in the growing season can increase branching by 2–6 times over non‐browsed plants, while removal late in the season may have little influence on branching (Zeleznik, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%