2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4022282
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Apatinib Mesylate Monotherapy on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions and Immune Function in Patients with Breast Cancer after Radical Mastectomy

Abstract: Objective. To assess the effects of monotherapy with apatinib mesylate on the incidence of adverse events and immune function in breast cancer patients after a radical mastectomy. Methods. Between December 2018 and August 2020, 90 patients with breast cancer scheduled for a radical mastectomy in People’s Liberation Army Navy 971 Hospital were randomly recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either conventional treatment (conventional group) or apatinib mesylate after radical mastectomy (study gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, with the increase of women's life and work pressure, the incidence of breast cancer has also been rising, and it is expanding toward a younger group [ 14 , 15 ]. At present, radical surgery is the preferred solution for the treatment of breast cancer [ 16 , 17 ]. However, breast cancer is a systemic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the increase of women's life and work pressure, the incidence of breast cancer has also been rising, and it is expanding toward a younger group [ 14 , 15 ]. At present, radical surgery is the preferred solution for the treatment of breast cancer [ 16 , 17 ]. However, breast cancer is a systemic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%