2017
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of antibody disulfide bond reduction on purification process performance and final drug substance stability

Abstract: Antibody disulfide bond reduction during monoclonal antibody (mAb) production is a phenomenon that has been attributed to the reducing enzymes from CHO cells acting on the mAb during the harvest process. However, the impact of antibody reduction on the downstream purification process has not been studied. During the production of an IgG2 mAb, antibody reduction was observed in the harvested cell culture fluid (HCCF), resulting in high fragment levels. In addition, aggregate levels increased during the low pH t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A link between mAb reduction and product aggregate formation has been previously demonstrated (Chung et al, 2017). However, we did not observe any change in product aggregates (Figure 4b) across any of the conditions despite having varying levels of mAb reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A link between mAb reduction and product aggregate formation has been previously demonstrated (Chung et al, 2017). However, we did not observe any change in product aggregates (Figure 4b) across any of the conditions despite having varying levels of mAb reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A challenge that has received increased attention in recent years relates to the reduction of monoclonal antibody (mAb) interchain disulfide bonds during manufacturing processes (Handlogten, Zhu, & Ahuja, 2017; Hutterer et al, 2013; Kao, Hewitt, Trexler‐Schmidt, & Laird, 2010; O'Mara et al, 2019). Antibody reduction results in the loss of product, requires more complex purification processes, and can reduce the stability of the drug product (Chung et al, 2017; Mun et al, 2015). For some processes, mAb reduction does not occur until the harvest stage where shear forces caused by the harvest process can lyse the cells, releasing the reductases responsible for mAb reduction (Chung et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antibody reduction can also impact glycan microheterogeneity (Dionne, Mishra, & Butler, 2017), increase aggregate levels at the low pH viral inactivation step (Chung et al, 2017), and impart color to the product via unwanted reactions with hydroxocobalamin (the active form of vitamin B12) in cell culture media (Derfus et al, 2014;Du, Martin, et al, 2018;Prentice et al, 2013;Vijayasankaran et al, 2013;Vijayasankaran, Varma, Yang, Meier, & Kiss, 2018;Wierzba, Wojciechowska, Trylska, & Gryko, 2016;Xu et al, 2014). Antibody reduction can also impact glycan microheterogeneity (Dionne, Mishra, & Butler, 2017), increase aggregate levels at the low pH viral inactivation step (Chung et al, 2017), and impart color to the product via unwanted reactions with hydroxocobalamin (the active form of vitamin B12) in cell culture media (Derfus et al, 2014;Du, Martin, et al, 2018;Prentice et al, 2013;Vijayasankaran et al, 2013;Vijayasankaran, Varma, Yang, Meier, & Kiss, 2018;Wierzba, Wojciechowska, Trylska, & Gryko, 2016;Xu et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential strategies to reduce or prevent antibody reduction include lowering the pH of the cell culture (Xie et al, 2016) and clarified harvest , manipulating culture redox potential (Dionne et al, 2017), maintaining a minimum DO in the bioreactor before harvest (Mullan et al, 2011), partially filling the clarified harvest storage bag with air (Mullan et al, 2011), minimizing cell lysis during harvest, sparging of air in the clarified harvest to prevent low DO conditions (Kao, Laird, Schmidt, Wong, & Hewitt, 2009;Mun et al, 2015;Singh, Fishkin, Kitchener, & Meshulam, 2017;Trexler-Schmidt et al, 2010), addition of inhibitors to prevent the Trx system mechanism (Chung et al, 2017;Kao et al, 2009), addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid to chelate Mg 2+ and inhibit hexokinase (HK) (Bruhlmann et al, 2015;Kao et al, 2010;McAtee, Templeton, & Young, 2014;Trexler-Schmidt et al, 2010), addition of copper ions as an oxidizing agent (Chaderjian, Chin, Harris, & Etcheverry, 2005), addition of hydrogen peroxide to maintain oxidative conditions , addition of antireducing agents (Singh et al, 2017), knockdown of Trx-1 expression (Koterba, Borgschulte, & Laird, 2012), and use of low temperature to increase oxygen solubility and lower enzymatic rates (Chung et al, 2017). Potential strategies to reduce or prevent antibody reduction include lowering the pH of the cell culture (Xie et al, 2016) and clarified harvest , manipulating culture redox potential (Dionne et al, 2017), maintaining a minimum DO in the bioreactor before harvest (Mullan et al, 2011), partially filling the clarified harvest storage bag with air (Mullan et al, 2011), minimizing cell lysis during harvest, sparging of air in the clarified harvest to prevent low DO conditions (Kao, Laird, Schmidt, Wong, & Hewitt, 2009;Mun et al, 2015;Singh, Fishkin, Kitchener, & Meshulam, 2017;Trexler-Schmidt et al, 2010), addition of inhibitors to prevent the Trx system mechanism …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%