1978
DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb02432.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Antianxiety Drug and Personality on Stress‐Inducing Psychomotor Performance Test

Abstract: The present study was carried out to clarify the effects of an antianxiety drug and of personality characteristics on a psychomotor performance test. Forty-eight healthy women college students were chosen from 64 volunteers as having either high or low levels of trait anxiety, neuroticism, or extroversion. Subjects with high trait anxiety and/or neuroticism tended to show a decrease in both speed and accuracy of the mirror drawing test (MDT) in the initial nondrug trials. Bromazepam, 5 mg, a benzodiazepine der… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive correlations of neuroticism scores on the EPI with diazepam effect are consistent with Nakano et al [1978], who reported that bromazepam improved performance in subjects with high neuroticism scores while worsening that of less anxious individuals. Breier et al [1979] reported a positive correlation between extraversión and response to ACTH 4-10, a heptapeptide reported to increase alertness and attention in hu mans [Miller et al, 1974].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The positive correlations of neuroticism scores on the EPI with diazepam effect are consistent with Nakano et al [1978], who reported that bromazepam improved performance in subjects with high neuroticism scores while worsening that of less anxious individuals. Breier et al [1979] reported a positive correlation between extraversión and response to ACTH 4-10, a heptapeptide reported to increase alertness and attention in hu mans [Miller et al, 1974].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These results are consistent with previous findings that responses to benzodiazepines are highly dependent on participants' trait anxiety levels. 12 One of the particular aims of this study was to find out what type of children would benefit most from the use of midazolam in terms of parent-rated child temperament variables. It was hypothesized that trait emotionality, as measured on the EASI, might be a good predictor of how children would react in a stressful, preoperative situation when administered a placebo, and that trait emotionality might predict which children would benefit most from midazolam administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also predicted that children with higher predrug baseline levels of observer-rated anxiety would benefit more from midazolam's anxiolytic effects than would children with lower pre-drug baseline levels of observer-rated anxiety. 12 Since state anxiety and trait emotionality scores tend to be highly correlated, 13 we also hypothesized that children with higher trait emotionality, as measured by the Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, and Impulsivity (EASI), would benefit more from midazolam's anxiolytic effects than would children with lower trait emotionality, and that lower levels of both Activity and Impulsivity would be related to higher m-YPAS scores at mask induction in the placebo group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies using a mirror drawing test with an error signal as performance test, sub jects with high trait anxiety showed decrement of performance, especially in the early stage of learning, while the antianxiety drugs diazepam or bromazepam, 5 mg, lessened this decrement (Nakano, S., Ogawa, N., Kawazu, Y. et al, 1978 ;Nakano, S., Gillespie, H. K. and Hollister, L. E., 1978 ; According to our experience, the ideal situation would be the choice of subjects with high levels of trait anxiety who are subjected to a task known to evoke high levels of state anxiety (Nakano, S., Ogawa, N., Kawazu, Y. et al, 1978 ; Nakano, S., Gillespie, H. K. and .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%