2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01343-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of antenatal corticosteroid administration on mortality and long-term morbidity in early preterm, growth-restricted infants

Abstract: Benefits from antenatal corticosteroids for early preterm, growth-restricted infants appear to outweigh possible adverse effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
46
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Another case control study looked at long-term outcomes of preterm infants with growth restriction secondary to placental insufficiency. 28 Of 124 infants born between 26 and 32 weeks gestation survival without disability or handicap at two years of age was higher in the corticosteroid group than matched controls. Conversely, a recent systematic review of antenatal corticosteroid therapy for growth-restricted, preterm infants concluded that treatment has no effect on neonatal morbidity or mortality in this population.…”
Section: Efficacy In Special Patient Populationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Another case control study looked at long-term outcomes of preterm infants with growth restriction secondary to placental insufficiency. 28 Of 124 infants born between 26 and 32 weeks gestation survival without disability or handicap at two years of age was higher in the corticosteroid group than matched controls. Conversely, a recent systematic review of antenatal corticosteroid therapy for growth-restricted, preterm infants concluded that treatment has no effect on neonatal morbidity or mortality in this population.…”
Section: Efficacy In Special Patient Populationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If these mothers remain undelivered after a week of therapy with steroids, some practitioners use repeated courses in the belief that effect of previous dose has worn off even though there is no scientific basis to support this practice [6,[27][28][29]. Long-term follow up studies of infants born after use of a single course of antenatal steroids have not shown any deleterious effects on survivors [4,5,30,31] but there is substantial body of evidence from animal [32][33][34] and human studies that repeated courses of steroids offer no advantage and may even be harmful for the mother as well as the newborn [10,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of therapy led to improvement in short term [3] and long term outcomes [4,5] of these infants. Later obstetricians all over the world started using multiple courses of steroids when delivery did not occur after the first course of steroids [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, in a study on 124 IUGR and preterm infants born at 26-31 weeks' gestation in 1984-1991, Schaap et al [25 ]found a significant protective effect of ACT on neurodevelopmental development, with greater survival without disability or handicap at 2 years of corrected age (OR 3.2 [1.1-11.2]) compared to non-IUGR and preterm infants. Nevertheless, this was a case-control study based on a small number of patients from only 2 centers and all born by C-section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%