2002
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2002.802146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of anode materials on the performance of explosive field emission diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the SEM images show no evidence of explosive field emission, a fact consistent with previous experimental results 6,7 and with modeling and simulation efforts to be presented in future publications. 8 ͑Overheated or exploded fiber tips appear to have mushroomlike structure that will be discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…First, the SEM images show no evidence of explosive field emission, a fact consistent with previous experimental results 6,7 and with modeling and simulation efforts to be presented in future publications. 8 ͑Overheated or exploded fiber tips appear to have mushroomlike structure that will be discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The neutrals per electron plot, however, shows two roughly linear behaviors in this parameter range; the shots using the molybdenum mesh generated 0.38 neutrals per electron versus the 0.73 neutrals per electron for the shots using the carbon fiber anode. This significant difference in gas generation supports the conclusion [7] that the explosive emission cathode is not necessarily the largest source of outgassing in such a diode. These yields are possibly also a function of the incoming electron's energy, but this experimental setup did not allow us to accurately probe a wide enough parameter space to test this conjecture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Over the pulse duration, the current variation is due to several factors which depend on the diode operation. These factors are the voltage increase, the changes introduced in the diode geometry by the expanding velvet plasma [27] and ion flow from the anode [28]. In our study, the hollowness of the anode and the large AK gap (17.2 cm) prevents ion flow from the anode during the time window of interest.…”
Section: Diode Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%