2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3812407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ankle Joint Motion on Pelvis-Hip Biomechanics and Muscle Activity Patterns of Healthy Individuals in Knee Immobilization Gait

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to investigate the pelvis-hip biomechanics and trunk and lower limb muscle activity patterns between healthy people walking in two gaits and evaluate the effects of ankle joint motion on these two gaits. The two gaits included walking with combined knee and ankle immobilization and with individual knee immobilization. Ten healthy participants were recruited and asked to walk along a 10 m walk away at their comfortable speeds in the two gaits. Kinematic data, ground reaction force, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Muscle activation can be estimated using experimental EMG data and normalized to EMG at MVC. Healthy walking recruits lower-limb muscles generally to below or up to 50% of their MVC ( Burden et al, 2003 ; Nishijima et al, 2010 ; Franz and Kram, 2013 ; Guan et al, 2019 ; Elsais et al, 2020 ), with many values in the literature being considerably lower than 50%. A range between 5%–64% has been reported for different muscles with an average value of ∼ 27%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle activation can be estimated using experimental EMG data and normalized to EMG at MVC. Healthy walking recruits lower-limb muscles generally to below or up to 50% of their MVC ( Burden et al, 2003 ; Nishijima et al, 2010 ; Franz and Kram, 2013 ; Guan et al, 2019 ; Elsais et al, 2020 ), with many values in the literature being considerably lower than 50%. A range between 5%–64% has been reported for different muscles with an average value of ∼ 27%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injured joints altered the force of transfer in the lower extremities and decreased shock absorption, which is transferred to the spine and can cause potential low back pain development [ 40 ]. The increased and early activation in the trunk muscles is related to a guarding mechanism to protect the lower back [ 41 ] or a result of limited ankle dorsiflexion in individuals with CAI which increases the range of RA activation [ 5 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint motion directions, in which the difference between the minimum and maximum joint angles was >5.0°, were identified for further analyses as these are clinically detectable. To compare and characterize the joint angles of each phase, the following variables were calculated: mean angles, calculated from the cumulative sequential data over each phase to provide the average position; range of motion (ROM), calculated as the difference between the minimum and maximum angles in each phase to quantify the motion [ 27 ]; and joint angles normalized to 101 points, corresponding to 0–100% of the movement time in each phase. The normalized data were then represented as the mean (SD) for each point in each phase, and waveforms of normalized joint angles were calculated for the visual analysis of the joint motion direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%