2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Anisotropic Permeability Evolution on Shale Gas Production: An Internal Swelling Factor Model

Abstract: Considerable attention has been paid to the anisotropic permeability of shale gas reservoirs, but the impacts of heterogeneous internal swelling have rarely been studied. In this research, we propose a new definition of the internal swelling factor (ISF) as the ratio of the increment in the pore adsorption strain to the increment in the matrix adsorption strain. In particular, we pioneered the study of the influence of the boundary conditions on the ISF. A new shale gas production model that considers the anis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When K n > 0.2, the flow regime is dominated by the diffusion effect; when K n < 0.01, the flow is dominated by seepage; and when 0.001 < K n < 0.2, the gas flow is in the form of coexistence of multiple flow patterns mainly including slip flow, surface diffusion, Fick diffusion, and Knudsen diffusion. Shale gas is stored in various states in a shale reservoir, mainly including free gas, adsorbed gas, and dissolved gas; the gas mass transfer is the common result of the above multiple flow regimes. In addition, the fluid–solid coupling effect of shale reservoir is obvious during the exploitation process due to the large burial depth. It is urgent to establish a productivity model of shale gas horizontal wells that can comprehensively considers the combined effects of multiple flow mechanisms and fluid–solid coupling effects of a shale reservoir, so as to achieve accurate productivity prediction and evaluation and optimize the location and spacing of fracturing wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When K n > 0.2, the flow regime is dominated by the diffusion effect; when K n < 0.01, the flow is dominated by seepage; and when 0.001 < K n < 0.2, the gas flow is in the form of coexistence of multiple flow patterns mainly including slip flow, surface diffusion, Fick diffusion, and Knudsen diffusion. Shale gas is stored in various states in a shale reservoir, mainly including free gas, adsorbed gas, and dissolved gas; the gas mass transfer is the common result of the above multiple flow regimes. In addition, the fluid–solid coupling effect of shale reservoir is obvious during the exploitation process due to the large burial depth. It is urgent to establish a productivity model of shale gas horizontal wells that can comprehensively considers the combined effects of multiple flow mechanisms and fluid–solid coupling effects of a shale reservoir, so as to achieve accurate productivity prediction and evaluation and optimize the location and spacing of fracturing wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the gas adsorption layer on nanopore wall reduces the effective radius of nanopores and thus influences shale permeability. On the other hand, gas adsorption on rock grains causes matrix swelling, compresses the nanopore radius, and thus changes the shale permeability. ,, In addition to the above-mentioned three factors, shale permeability could also be influenced by other factors. For instance, Cai et al proposed an easy-to-implement model and disclosed that shale permeability could be influenced by heterogeneous pore size distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we follow the basic framework of the DSI-based generic coal permeability model that can be used for different stress conditions , and proposed a new approach to solve the coupling between the flow regime and poromechanical deformation. In addition, a mathematical model of shale permeability was established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%