2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5969-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of an environmentally relevant concentration of diuron on oyster genitors during gametogenesis: responses of early molecular and cellular markers and physiological impacts

Abstract: Genitors of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas were submitted during gametogenesis to a short pulse exposure to the herbicide diuron at a realistic environmental concentration. Histological analysis showed no effect of diuron on gametogenesis course, sex ratio and reproductive effort. A non-significant increase in testosterone and progesterone levels was observed in genitors exposed to the herbicide. At cell level, diuron exposure was shown to modulate the phagocytic activity of circulating hemocytes. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study tends to reinforce the converging evidences supporting the fact that Diuron may be a potential tumorigenic substance. This effect was direct such as already reported to the bladder [14,15], urothelial [16], skin [17,18] and mammary [15][16][17][18][19] carcinogenesis or indirect via the decrease of immunosurveillance phenomenon. However, in the absence of study in human, our study should not be considered as an absolute proof of the guilt of Diuron in the occurrence of cancer but as a scientific rationale incriminating a potential cellular mechanism that may be at the origin of the initiation of cancer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study tends to reinforce the converging evidences supporting the fact that Diuron may be a potential tumorigenic substance. This effect was direct such as already reported to the bladder [14,15], urothelial [16], skin [17,18] and mammary [15][16][17][18][19] carcinogenesis or indirect via the decrease of immunosurveillance phenomenon. However, in the absence of study in human, our study should not be considered as an absolute proof of the guilt of Diuron in the occurrence of cancer but as a scientific rationale incriminating a potential cellular mechanism that may be at the origin of the initiation of cancer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Literature reports that Diuron affects the global DNA methylation level [15][16][17]; we first investigated whether Diuron exposure could affect the global DNA methylation level of the pDC-like cell line CAL-1. For this purpose, CAL-1 cells were expose to 25 mg/L of Diuron for 72 h since this herbicide and four of its metabolites had a total concentration as high as 100 mg/L in plasma and urine [25] (Fig.…”
Section: Diuron Exposure Promotes the Tet2-mediated Dna Hypomethylatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cellular or molecular analysis, such as metabolomics, offers insights regarding broad molecular changes that could occur in an individual as a result of chemical exposure, and thus provides information that may relate to the mechanistic underpinnings of observed higher level effects (Lin et al 2007; Bouhifd et al 2013). Because pesticides can have physiological (Yasmin and D'Souza 2010), molecular (Van Meter et al 2018), and cellular (Akcha et al 2016) effects on nontarget species, the integration of multiple approaches to ecotoxicology studies will provide a better understanding of the overall pesticide toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, diuron is suspected to be a carcinogenic and genotoxic compound for both humans and aquatic organisms such as fish (Huovinen et al, 2015, Canna-Michaelidou andNicolaou, 1996). In C. gigas, direct exposure of adult oysters to an environmentally realistic concentration of diuron (from 0.05 µg/L upwards) has a genotoxic effect in somatic, germ and gamete cells (Akcha et al, 2016). Moreover, an aneugenic effect and a negative impact on development have been observed in the next spat generation (Barranger et al, 2014, Bouilly et al, 2007, Barranger et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%