2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of amplitude and predictability of perturbations to the arm on anticipatory and reactionary muscle responses to maintain balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of perturbation predictability have been studied with respect to two characteristics, magnitude of the perturbation (Toussaint et al 1998; Habib Perez et al 2016; Forghani et al 2017a,b) and its direction (Gilles et al 1998; Piscitelli et al 2017). No systematic effects of perturbation direction uncertainty on the latency and rate of increase of ground reaction forces were reported in a study with lateral body perturbations (Gilles et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of perturbation predictability have been studied with respect to two characteristics, magnitude of the perturbation (Toussaint et al 1998; Habib Perez et al 2016; Forghani et al 2017a,b) and its direction (Gilles et al 1998; Piscitelli et al 2017). No systematic effects of perturbation direction uncertainty on the latency and rate of increase of ground reaction forces were reported in a study with lateral body perturbations (Gilles et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contact may provide proprioceptive input and biofeedback. In some surface EMG studies, proprioceptive input and biofeedback increase muscle activation have been reported (24,25). However, in order to be performed CTAR exercise, a sufficient upper extremity function is needed to keep the ball under the jaw.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, we also showed that the latency difference between the earliest changes in body kinematics and kinetics induced by the perturbation and the response in ankle muscles was not affected by stance width. By varying the amplitude of the perturbation we confirmed that the postural responses to arm perturbations scaled with the magnitude of the perturbation without altering their temporal organization [ 12 ]. From the results of these studies we determined that the rapid response in ankle muscles could not be triggered by signals from sensory receptors in leg muscles or cutaneous receptors in the foot because the ankle did not begin to move and ground reaction force did not begin to change until after the onset of ankle muscle activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Subjects subsequently performed the task under several other conditions during the same session. The analysis and results of the subsequent conditions have been presented in previous studies [ 10 12 ] cited in the Introduction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation