2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00574.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of amount of intake and stage of forage maturity on urinary allantoin excretion and estimated microbial crude protein synthesis in the rumen of steers

Abstract: Using ruminally cannulated steers, we investigated how urinary allantoin excretion was related to variations in feed intake and stage of forage maturity. Further, different approaches were compared for predicting ruminal microbial crude protein (MCP) synthesis and its efficiency. Experimental diets were arranged in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design (experiment 1) and a 4 x 4 Latin square design (experiment 2). In experiment 1, a mixed diet [forage to concentrate, 68:32 on a dry matter (DM) basis] was fed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
16
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have reported that DOM intake can be a good estimator of the EMPS when there is adequate N intake (AFRC, 1992;. The EMPS values obtained in the EC-10 and EC-25 treatments (Table 4) were lower than the range of 12.0 and 28.3 g N kg -1 OMTDR reported for ewes by and the range of 25 to 27 g N OMADR found for steers by Südekum et al (2006). Furthermore, the results from Orellana et al (1998) obtained with dairy cows match those obtained in our study for the highest intake of EC (between 13 and 17 g N kg -1 DOMR), with the highest EMPS corresponding to the highest concentrate levels.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Microbial Protein Synthesismentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors have reported that DOM intake can be a good estimator of the EMPS when there is adequate N intake (AFRC, 1992;. The EMPS values obtained in the EC-10 and EC-25 treatments (Table 4) were lower than the range of 12.0 and 28.3 g N kg -1 OMTDR reported for ewes by and the range of 25 to 27 g N OMADR found for steers by Südekum et al (2006). Furthermore, the results from Orellana et al (1998) obtained with dairy cows match those obtained in our study for the highest intake of EC (between 13 and 17 g N kg -1 DOMR), with the highest EMPS corresponding to the highest concentrate levels.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Microbial Protein Synthesismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Digestible OM intake (DOMI) was calculated from OM digestibility and daily OM intake. Organic matter truly digested in the rumen (OMTDR; kg d -1 ) was calculated from the relationship OMTDR = 0.55 × OMI (Stern et al, 1994;Südekum et al, 2006). The OM apparently digested in the rumen (OMADR, kg d -1 ) was determined by the relationship: OMADR = 0.60 × DOMI (Schröder et al, 1997;Südekum et al, 2006).…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N consumed by cattle ultimately appears in either the urine, feces or is interchanged with the body's N reserves (Südekum et al, 2005). Total N excretion tended to be increased (0.6-1.0 g/d) when increasing urea at 1.3-1.9% DM in concentrate diets.…”
Section: N Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1). In many Table 3 The endogenous contribution (μmol/kg BW 0.75 per day (±SD)) to urinary excretion of total purine derivates (PD) or allantoin, estimated in steers, dry and lactating cows with different methods studies with cattle, the excretion of allantoin or total PD in urine was not only well related with duodenal flows of N, NAN, or microbial N, but also with dietary RDP content (Reynal et al, 2005), dry matter intake (R 2 = 0.50, Stefanon et al, 1995;Moorby et al, 2006), organic matter intake (R 2 = 0.62, Susmel et al, 1994), digestible organic matter intake (R 2 = 0785, Südekum et al, 2006), and N intake (R 2 = 0.91, Stefanon et al, 1995). Firkins et al (2006) showed with a large dataset (339 observations) that urinary allantoin excretion was best explained in lactating cattle by milk yield, intake of RDP and of non-fibre carbohydrates (NFC), and in nonlactating cattle solely by intake of RDP.…”
Section: Validation Of Microbial N Flow Estimated With Urinary Pd Excmentioning
confidence: 96%