2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of amiloride on physiological activity of stem cells of human lung cancer and possible mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous studies have attributed pharmacological effects to a specific target of interest following treatment with amiloride or an analog without consideration of possible off-target effects [41][42][43]. In the cancer field alone, there are a several examples whereby effects have been ascribed to inhibition of either uPA [44][45][46] or NHE1 [47][48][49] without controlling for possible effects from the other target. The situation is further confounded in studies that use amiloride as a "specific inhibitor" due to possible effects from ENaC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous studies have attributed pharmacological effects to a specific target of interest following treatment with amiloride or an analog without consideration of possible off-target effects [41][42][43]. In the cancer field alone, there are a several examples whereby effects have been ascribed to inhibition of either uPA [44][45][46] or NHE1 [47][48][49] without controlling for possible effects from the other target. The situation is further confounded in studies that use amiloride as a "specific inhibitor" due to possible effects from ENaC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have established that the inhibition of extracellular vesicle (EV) secretion using diuretic agents like Amiloride (AME) or small molecule inhibitors such as GW4869 can effectively reduce the growth of pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers [38][39][40][41][42]. However, the potential impact of inhibiting proteins involved in EV secretion pathways or blocking exosome secretion as a means of prevention or oncotherapy in the context of obesity-mediated endometrial cancer (EC) has not been previously explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased uPA expression and activity promote tumour cell invasion into surrounding tissues by stimulating the breakdown of BM and ECM (Andreasen et al 1997;Didiasova et al 2014;Magill et al 1999). Dysregulated activity of the uPAS is also implicated in tumour cell proliferation, migration and metastasis (Kugaevskaya et al 2018;Mahmood et al 2018;Zhang et al 2018) and contributes to poor prognosis (Su et al 2016) and progression in various cancers including melanoma (Cho et al 2019), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Wei et al 2019), lung adenocarcinoma (Zhu et al 2020), neuroendocrine (Özdirik et al 2020), oral (Wyganowska-Świątkowska & Jankun 2015), gastric (Brungs et al 2017;Kaneko et al 2003), ovarian (van der Burg et al 1996), breast (Tang & Han 2013;Xing & Rabbani 1996), prostate (Kimura et al 2020), colorectal (Yang et al 2000) and bladder cancers (Hasui & Osada 1997;Iwata et al 2019). In breast cancer, the uPAS has been identified as the most reliable independent prognostic marker of poor prognosis (Banys-Paluchowski et al 2019;Bouchet et al 1994;Duffy et al 1988;Foekens et al 2000;Harbeck et al 2002).…”
Section: The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System (Upas)mentioning
confidence: 99%