The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alkaline earth promoters on the catalytic performance of the nickel catalysts supported on high surface area mesoporous magnesium silicate in dry reforming reaction

Abstract: 10% Ni-MgSiO 3 10% Ni/1% MgO-MgSiO 3 10% Ni/3% MgO-MgSiO 3 10% Ni/6% MgO-MgSiO 3 TPO analysis MgO promoted catalysts exhibited higher catalytic activity and lower carbon formation compared to unpromoted catalyst in dry reforming reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SBET decreased to 198, 193, and 193 m 2 g -1 and the pore volume was reduced to 0.63, 0.53, and 0.56 cm 3 g -1 after modification with Na2CO3, NaHCO3, and NaOH, respectively (Table 2, entries 2-4). It can be explained by the fact that the addition of Na species occupied a small number of pores [50]. In summary, the diversification in these structural parameters was too little to be considered as the factor deciding the catalytic performance.…”
Section: Analysis Of Catalytic Activity Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SBET decreased to 198, 193, and 193 m 2 g -1 and the pore volume was reduced to 0.63, 0.53, and 0.56 cm 3 g -1 after modification with Na2CO3, NaHCO3, and NaOH, respectively (Table 2, entries 2-4). It can be explained by the fact that the addition of Na species occupied a small number of pores [50]. In summary, the diversification in these structural parameters was too little to be considered as the factor deciding the catalytic performance.…”
Section: Analysis Of Catalytic Activity Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the addition of promoters affects the acid-base sites of the supports, and thus changes the adsorption/desorption equilibrium of the reaction species [6,18,[46][47][48][49]. Third, they enhance the dispersion of active components and stability of the catalysts [7,46,50,72,73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides Al 2 O 3 , other supports were also explored. As an inert support, SiO 2 has a weak interaction with Ni, leading to relatively weak metal‐support interaction and are less stable and less active compared to mildly acidic (Al 2 O 3 ) and basic (La 2 O 3 , CeO 2 ) supports . However, the high dispersion of Ni nanoparticles in nanochannels of cerium‐modified silica aerogels or in mesoporous silica can improve the catalytic activity and thermal stability .…”
Section: Dry Reforming Of Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of chromium compounds for environmentally friendly selective oxidation reactions in the liquid or gas phases depends on the adhesion to specific catalyst supports. In addition, the nature of the catalyst support affects the performance, application, and properties of catalysts [ 22 , 23 ]. There are a lot of requirements for catalyst supports, but the high surface area and thermal stability are some of the most important ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%