2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1463-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alcohol consumption and alcohol expectancy on the categorisation of perceptual cues of emotional expression

Abstract: Our data indicate that alcohol consumption may increase the likelihood of an ambiguous but negative facial expression being judged as angry. However, these effects were only observed for male faces and therefore may have been influenced by the greater expectation of aggression in males compared to females. Implications for alcohol-associated aggressive behaviour are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were then asked to drink beer (alcoholic or non-alcoholic) over 15 min, and tests were performed starting 30 min after the start of beer intake when maximal effects were expected (Bershad et al 2015). We used a low-to-moderate dose of alcohol that sought to achieve a BAC of 0.4 g/L, which was associated with alterations in emotion recognition in some previous studies but not expected to result in nonspecific performance deficits (Attwood et al 2009a). The amount of alcohol was estimated for each participant based on sex and body weight according to the formula presented by Fisher et al (Fisher et al 1987): Target BAC = 0.4 g/L = G × 100 × 0.8 / (W × F), where G is the grams of alcohol, W is the body weight (in kilograms), and F is the conversion factor for the calculation of total body water (0.583 and 0.485 in male and female participants, respectively).…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The participants were then asked to drink beer (alcoholic or non-alcoholic) over 15 min, and tests were performed starting 30 min after the start of beer intake when maximal effects were expected (Bershad et al 2015). We used a low-to-moderate dose of alcohol that sought to achieve a BAC of 0.4 g/L, which was associated with alterations in emotion recognition in some previous studies but not expected to result in nonspecific performance deficits (Attwood et al 2009a). The amount of alcohol was estimated for each participant based on sex and body weight according to the formula presented by Fisher et al (Fisher et al 1987): Target BAC = 0.4 g/L = G × 100 × 0.8 / (W × F), where G is the grams of alcohol, W is the body weight (in kilograms), and F is the conversion factor for the calculation of total body water (0.583 and 0.485 in male and female participants, respectively).…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual analog scales (VASs; (Attwood et al 2009a;Bershad et al 2015;Hysek et al 2012) were used to assess the subjective effects of alcohol, including feeling "any effect," "stimulated," "happy," "talkative," "open," "be with others," and "be alone," before and 30, 70, and 95 min after beer administration. The VASs were presented as 100 mm horizontal lines that were marked ''not at all'' on the left and ''extremely'' on the right.…”
Section: Subjective Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early meta-analysis (Hull and Bond 1986) of the anticipated and pharmacological effects of alcohol concluded that the anticipated effects of alcohol have important behavioural consequences, arguing the belief that one is intoxicated may provide an excuse not to inhibit behaviour. However, using balanced placebo designs, (randomly allocating participants to be told they will receive an alcoholic or non-alcoholic drink, despite actual content) both Craig et al (2009) and Attwood et al (2009) found pharmacological, but not anticipated, effects of alcohol on emotional perception. With regard to the alcohol priming effect, we (Christiansen et al 2013) utilised a partially balanced placebo design in which participants received alcoholic, placebo and control drinks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary evidence suggests that acute alcohol use may impair basic affective processing skills, with subtle gender differences in alcohol’s acute effects. For example, acute alcohol administration, but not placebo, leads to misidentification of emotional faces, (Attwood et al, 2009a) and males had more difficulty correctly labeling a sad facial emotion compared with females following a high dose of alcohol (Attwood et al, 2009b). Gilman and colleagues (2008) reported that acute alcohol consumption increased activation to fearful stimuli in striatal regions, but attenuated activation in visual and limbic areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%