2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of air cleaners and school characteristics on classroom concentrations of particulate matter in 34 elementary schools in Korea

Abstract: Exposure to particulate matter (PM) in school environments has been associated with respiratory illnesses among children. Although using air cleaners was reported to reduce PM exposure and improve residents' health in homes, their effects in classrooms are not well understood. We examined how the use of air cleaners in classrooms and school/classroom characteristics affect the levels of indoor PM. Our environmental study included 102 classrooms from 34 elementary schools located on the mainland peninsula and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measurements as well as previous studies (e.g., Polidori et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2015;Park et al, 2020) demonstrate that operating air purifiers continuously in a closed room also reduces the amount of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) considerably. The WHO recommends that the average exposure levels to PM 2.5 should be below 10 µg/m 3 because higher exposure increases the risks of ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, cerebrovascular disease leading to stroke, and various other diseases.…”
Section: Co-benefitssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our measurements as well as previous studies (e.g., Polidori et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2015;Park et al, 2020) demonstrate that operating air purifiers continuously in a closed room also reduces the amount of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) considerably. The WHO recommends that the average exposure levels to PM 2.5 should be below 10 µg/m 3 because higher exposure increases the risks of ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, cerebrovascular disease leading to stroke, and various other diseases.…”
Section: Co-benefitssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A few studies have tested air purifiers in classrooms, e.g. as a measure to reduce exposure to PM for children with asthma (Jhun et al, 2018), , the efficiency to remove ultrafine particles, black carbon, PM 2.5 and PM 10 was tested (Polidori et al, 2013), or PM2.5 and PM10 alone (Park et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements as well as previous studies (e.g., Chen et al 2015;Park et al 2020;Polidori et al 2013) demonstrate that operating air purifiers continuously in a closed room also reduces the amount of particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ) considerably. The WHO recommends that the average exposure levels to PM 2.5 should be below 10 µg/m 3 because higher exposure increases the risks of ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, cerebrovascular disease leading to stroke, and various other diseases.…”
Section: Co-benefitssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Filter-type air purifiers are used to control indoor fine particulate matter in South Korea, and there has been a broad range of studies on air purifiers and fine particulate matter. However, previous studies focused on the purification effects caused by the airflow rate and filter grade of air purifiers and have not evaluated the operating method of air purifiers that considers the inflow path of fine particulate matter into the body and the breathing zone of occupants or the performance in reducing the concentration of particulate matter [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. As various sources cause indoor fine particulate matter [20], operating a fixed air purifier can reduce the average concentration of indoor fine particulate matter, but the reduction effect against fine particulate matter in local areas such as the breathing zone of occupants is inadequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%