2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aging on habituation to novelty: An ERP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(155 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age-related reduction in the P3b to targets is in agreement with many reports in the literature (Anderer et al, 1998; Fabiani & Friedman, 1995; Fabiani et al, 1998; Li et al, 2013; O'Connell et al, 2012; Richardson et al, 2011) and may reflect attenuation of the categorization process or the ability to update working memory after a target has been detected (Daffner et al, 2011a; Donchin, 1981; Donchin & Coles, 1988; Knight & Scabini, 1998; Kok, 2001). Prior work has indicated that cognitive operations like sustaining attention on a task may compete for a shared pool of limited resources with the categorization/updating process (Daffner et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age-related reduction in the P3b to targets is in agreement with many reports in the literature (Anderer et al, 1998; Fabiani & Friedman, 1995; Fabiani et al, 1998; Li et al, 2013; O'Connell et al, 2012; Richardson et al, 2011) and may reflect attenuation of the categorization process or the ability to update working memory after a target has been detected (Daffner et al, 2011a; Donchin, 1981; Donchin & Coles, 1988; Knight & Scabini, 1998; Kok, 2001). Prior work has indicated that cognitive operations like sustaining attention on a task may compete for a shared pool of limited resources with the categorization/updating process (Daffner et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To address this issue, we also examined age-associated differences in neural responses to targets and standards separately. A decrease in the P3b response to targets among older adults has commonly been reported (Anderer, Pascual-Marqui, Semlitsch, & Saletu, 1998; Fabiani & Friedman, 1995; Fabiani, Friedman, & Cheng, 1998; Li, Gratton, Fabiani, & Knight, 2013; O'Connell et al, 2012; Richardson, Bucks, & Hogan, 2011). Although age-associated differences in P3b responses to standard events have generally not been emphasized in the literature, we have found an increase in P3 responses to standard stimuli with age in cognitively high performing adults (Daffner et al, 2005; Riis et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As mentioned earlier, the discrepancy between our findings and those of prior studies can be accounted for by the material used. For instance, Richardson et al [46] also reported no effect on ERP latencies with repetition of computer generated novel sounds, like the ones we used here, albeit their focus was on P3 waves. Also, a previous study focusing on neural adaptation to voices did not reveal any effect on N1 and P2 latencies [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some studies showed that the development of specific memory traces in the human auditory cortex is fast, taking as little as tens of seconds after repetitive stimulation [43,44,45]. In another study, Richardson et al [46] measured the P3 wave (a late positive deflection that peaks between 200 and 520 ms at parietal sites) elicited by complex, everyday sounds (e.g., dog bark, drum beat and car horn), and found a reduced P3 suppression to sound repetition in older adults compared to young adults. Their results were explained by the fact that older adults were less able to construct category templates [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this theory, young adults generate a novelty P3 in response to targets, but quickly habituate the response, which results in an overall diminutive P3a. There is supporting evidence that old individuals do not habituate a novelty response to novel stimuli while young adults do [1921]. These studies employed a method in which the subject's response to novel stimuli during early blocks or trials is compared to their response during late blocks or trials in order to examine the change in the novelty response as the task progresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%