2002
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the extent to which gradients are asymmetrical in this way in any given study also reflects the veridicality of longterm memory of the standard. Previous research suggests that the representation of the time intervals may become distorted in long-term memory Shurtleff et al 1992), with the standard being systematically mis-remembered as being either shorter (McCormack et al 1999) or longer (Wearden et al 1999 ;McCormack et al 2002) than it actually was. Since responses are made by comparing the memory representation of the standard with the representation of the current test stimulus, such distortion will affect the probability that erroneous positive responses are given to stimuli shorter or longer than the standard.…”
Section: Experiments 1 : Temporal Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the extent to which gradients are asymmetrical in this way in any given study also reflects the veridicality of longterm memory of the standard. Previous research suggests that the representation of the time intervals may become distorted in long-term memory Shurtleff et al 1992), with the standard being systematically mis-remembered as being either shorter (McCormack et al 1999) or longer (Wearden et al 1999 ;McCormack et al 2002) than it actually was. Since responses are made by comparing the memory representation of the standard with the representation of the current test stimulus, such distortion will affect the probability that erroneous positive responses are given to stimuli shorter or longer than the standard.…”
Section: Experiments 1 : Temporal Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, there could be qualitative developmental changes that are specific to the long-term memory processes recruited in the task. Scalar timing models assume that memory distortion effects can occur in certain populations Elvev a ag et al, 2003b;Lejeune, Ferrara, Soffie, Bronchart, & Wearden, 1998;Malapani, Deweer, & Gibbon, 2002;McCormack et al, 1999;McCormack, Brown, Maylor, Richardson, & Darby, 2002;Meck, 1996) or under certain conditions (Meck, 1996;Meck & Church, 1987). The idea is that durations can be systematically misrepresented in memory as too short or as too long.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on monitoring temporal duration has found robust age differences in time monitoring on a variety of time estimation tasks, most emphasizing the duration of simple perceptual events or performed actions (e.g., McCormack, Brown, Maylor, Richardson, & Darby, 2002;Salthouse, Wright, & Ellis, 1979;Wearden, Wearden, & Rabbitt, 1997). Block, Zakay, and Hancock's (1998) meta-analysis concluded that older adults overestimated temporal durations relative to younger adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that verbal estimates of temporal judgments with filled intervals underestimated temporal duration, whereas prospective production (requiring a response after a fixed amount of time) typically overestimated duration. Older adults' time estimates diverged more from actual durations in both types of tasks (see also McCormack et al, 2002). Craik and Hay (1999) suggested that aging affects both an internal clock and attention devoted to the passage of time that is constrained under divided attention or other resource demands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation