2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age on the outcome of peritoneal dialysis–associated peritonitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have explored whether a single variable (such as a biomarker or a new clinical biochemical parameter) can predict or correlate with certain outcomes, whereas building clinical prediction models by incorporating multiple variables is relatively complex. Nevertheless, clinical predictive models have been developed in recent years for (6,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The results of some previous studies are consistent with those of the current paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have explored whether a single variable (such as a biomarker or a new clinical biochemical parameter) can predict or correlate with certain outcomes, whereas building clinical prediction models by incorporating multiple variables is relatively complex. Nevertheless, clinical predictive models have been developed in recent years for (6,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The results of some previous studies are consistent with those of the current paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Clinical prediction models can inform patients and their physicians or other healthcare providers about the likelihood of disease development or progression in a patient, which can facilitate treatment decisions. The main risk factors included in previous PDAP clinical prediction models are age, UA, serum C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-Albumin ratio (CAR), NLR, RDW, DM, and cardiovascular disease ( 6 , 17–21 ). The results of some previous studies are consistent with those of the current paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%