2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

22
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
22
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the length of the stimulus was 150 msec-shorter than 200 msec , but longer than 40 msec used in Alain and McDonaldʼs (2007) study. The lack of age-related difference in ORN amplitude during passive listening is consistent with Alain et al (2012) and suggests that 150-msec sound duration is sufficient for older adults to process the mistuned harmonic. In older adults, the effect of musical training on the ORN amplitude was not significant, whereas the ORN was enhanced in younger musicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, the length of the stimulus was 150 msec-shorter than 200 msec , but longer than 40 msec used in Alain and McDonaldʼs (2007) study. The lack of age-related difference in ORN amplitude during passive listening is consistent with Alain et al (2012) and suggests that 150-msec sound duration is sufficient for older adults to process the mistuned harmonic. In older adults, the effect of musical training on the ORN amplitude was not significant, whereas the ORN was enhanced in younger musicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although one study found a reduced ORN amplitude in older adults (Alain & McDonald, 2007), a more recent study found that this age-related difference was due to the length of the stimulus (Alain, McDonald, & Van Roon, 2012). When the harmonic complex was short (i.e., 40 msec), older adults were less likely to hear the mistuned harmonic as a separate sound object and this age-related decline coincided with a reduction in ORN amplitude recorded during passive listening (Alain & McDonald, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Age-related differences in these ERPs have been investigated in numerous experiments, which mostly showed that these ERPs were enhanced in older adults (or no significant differences were present). Age-related enhancements of P1 or its enhancements magnetic counterpart were found, for example, by Alain et al (2012), Bertoli et al (2005), Fabiani et al (2006), Kovacevic et al (2005), Pekkonen et al (1995), Pfefferbaum et al (1979), and Smith et al (1980). An N1 amplitude increase with growing age was found among others by Amenedo and a (1998), Anderer et al (1996Anderer et al ( , 1998, Ford and Pfefferbaum (1991), and Pfefferbaum et al (1984); but Goodin et al (1978) observed age-related reduction of the N1-P2 amplitude (measured from peak-to-peak).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…One note of caution is that it is difficult to strictly compare the two conditions in the present study because they differed not only in the presence or absence of delay but also in stimulus onset asynchrony and tone duration, as well as in the order number of the manipulated harmonic, all of which can affect the ORN response [15,23]. Yet the occurrence of similar responses despite these differences can also be regarded as a strength in that it supports the generalizability of the observed ORN response in newborns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORN and its magnetic equivalent are sensitive not only to mistuning [15,16,18,19,20,21,22,23] but also to other cues of concurrent segregation such as onset asynchrony [24,25], differences or discontinuities in location [5,26], dichotic pitch [17,27,28,29,30,31], and simulated echo [32,33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%