2020
DOI: 10.20417/nzjecol.44.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aerial 1080 operations on deer populations in New Zealand

Abstract: Aerially distributed baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are used in New Zealand for smallmammal pest control over an average of about 600 000 ha each year. This can also kill non-target species, including deer. This incidental mortality of deer generates antipathy to 1080 amongst many hunters, adding to the broader opposition to aerial 1080. Hunter opposition to 1080 baiting has also prompted the development of deer-repellent 1080 bait formulations. Historical estimates of deer mortality varied widel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blackbirds are be affected by aerial 1080 operations (Morriss et al 2016;Van Vianen et al 2018), as are red deer with variable results (Malham et al 2019;Nugent & Fraser 2005;Graham Nugent et al 2019). We could not use deer repellent in conjunction with kea risk mitigation strategies, and although historical impacts of 1080 operations on deer have been highly variable, impacts can increase with higher rates of sowing (Morriss et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blackbirds are be affected by aerial 1080 operations (Morriss et al 2016;Van Vianen et al 2018), as are red deer with variable results (Malham et al 2019;Nugent & Fraser 2005;Graham Nugent et al 2019). We could not use deer repellent in conjunction with kea risk mitigation strategies, and although historical impacts of 1080 operations on deer have been highly variable, impacts can increase with higher rates of sowing (Morriss et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of the population killed, or population reduction, is commonly used to quantify the effectiveness of vertebrate pest control operations (Veltman and Pinder 2001;Morriss et al 2020). A higher population reduction per unit effort or cost is desirable (Veltman and Pinder 2001), but other factors such as social acceptability (Forsyth et al 2017) and animal welfare outcomes (Hampton et al 2022) need to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of the population killed, or population reduction, is commonly used to quantify the effectiveness of vertebrate pest control operations (Veltman and Pinder 2001; Morriss et al . 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests that the most cost‐effective way to severely cull deer populations at high density is the use of the toxicant sodium fluoroacetate (1080), which is a natural chemical derived from Gastrolobium that biodegrades rapidly after deployment (https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/methods-of-control/1080/why-we-use-1080/). Aerial 1080 deployment has an estimated cost of $33/ha or $3300 per km 2 (1.67 heli hours cost per km 2 equivalence) for small invasive mammal reductions (Morriss et al., 2020) where incidental deer kill rates ranged from 5% to 93% with a mean mortality rate of 50% (Nugent et al., 2001) with rates determined by bait preference, sowing density (kg/ha), ungulate size (smaller bodied species had higher mortality) and the toxicant naivete of the population (Morriss et al., 2020). This method was originally considered for Gwaii Haanas but was not adopted as it is not registered in Canada for vertebrates, by‐kill was likely and the meat would not have been safe for human consumption, which was critical in the local context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nz/ nature/ pests -and-threa ts/ metho ds-of-contr ol/ 1080/ why-we-use-1080/ ). Aerial 1080 deployment has an estimated cost of $33/ha or $3300 per km 2 (1.67 heli hours cost per km 2 equivalence) for small invasive mammal reductions (Morriss et al, 2020) where incidental deer kill rates ranged from 5% to 93% with a mean mortality rate of 50% (Nugent et al, 2001) with rates determined by bait preference, sowing density (kg/ ha), ungulate size (smaller bodied species had higher mortality)…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%