2021
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.664628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Acute Prolonged Sitting and Interrupting Prolonged Sitting on Heart Rate Variability and Heart Rate in Adults: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Prolonged sitting increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, however the physiological mechanisms contributing to CVD from acute sitting exposure are not well-understood. Therefore, this study investigated the heart rate (HR) and variability (HRV) responses to prolonged sitting and after interrupting prolonged sitting (e.g., walking). Electronic databases were searched (inception-August 2020) for studies which exposed adults to prolonged (≥1 h) sitting with and/or without interruptions. Twenty-one articles (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HR was increased during the day, with walking providing the highest HR, followed by continuous standing and sitting interrupted with standing. Previous research on changes in HR/HRV during interrupted prolonged sitting revealed moderate effects on HR only for healthy populations, and, additionally, walking as the interruption strategy resulted in the greatest increase in HR, as compared with other strategies 45 . For SDNN there are significant time × condition effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HR was increased during the day, with walking providing the highest HR, followed by continuous standing and sitting interrupted with standing. Previous research on changes in HR/HRV during interrupted prolonged sitting revealed moderate effects on HR only for healthy populations, and, additionally, walking as the interruption strategy resulted in the greatest increase in HR, as compared with other strategies 45 . For SDNN there are significant time × condition effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previous research on changes in HR/HRV during interrupted prolonged sitting revealed moderate effects on HR only for healthy populations, and, additionally, walking as the interruption strategy resulted in the greatest increase in HR, as compared with other strategies. 45 For SDNN there are significant time  condition effects. During the day, SDNN is sympathetically controlled and highest when sitting, whereas post-condition sympatheticparasympathetic answer during nighttime shows a sympathetically driven recovery situation, which is primarily evident for STAND, followed by SIT-STAND, WALK, and SIT.…”
Section: Hrv Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The improved HR/HRV responses to the seated control from this study were not consistent with previous findings. Our group previously performed a meta-analysis of HR/HRV responses to bouts of prolonged sitting and found no significant changes in response to prolonged sitting bouts [ 34 ]. Although the reasons why our study’s HR/HRV responses were different from those of the meta-analysis are unclear, the BP responses to our study’s prolonged seated condition were typical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, it has been generally recommended that prolonged sitting during deskwork should be reduced; therefore, investigation of the benefits of a balance of sitting and standing work may be task for the future [ 38 ]. The effects of HR monitoring remain unclear because interrupting prolonged sitting leads to a non-significant increase in HR [ 39 ]. Other possible explanations for the variation of B is that BP might be influenced by the jobs that require quick and precise decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%